Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This car car runs on air!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
7horses Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:07 PM
Original message
This car car runs on air!
The technology is here for a car that runs on air.

"BBC News is reporting that a French company has developed a pollution-free car which runs on compressed air." The cars is being produced in India.

"The air car, also known as the Mini-CAT or City Cat, can be refueled in minutes from an air compressor at specially equipped gas stations and can go 200 km on a 1.5 euro fill-up -- roughly 125 miles for $3. The top speed will be almost 70 mph and the cost of the vehicle as low as $7000."

The technology is here for a car that runs on air. The U. S. should/could have taken the lead on this technology. One reason the U. S. hasn't taken the lead is that, this kind of technology is being suppressed by the big oil companies and other corporations that only look at the bottom line.

Now is the time for the U. S. to take on the corporations and take the lead in developing the technology for the 21st. century. Help nominate and elect the candidate who will/can take on the corporations and change the way things are done in this country. John Edwards is not tied up with corporate, PAC, and lobby donations. Vote John Edwards for true change!!! Donate Friday to John Edwards to help break the record for a one day donation! Go, John go!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. of course we wont get it here in the states...europe has some great cars we cant get
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. The energy cost is powering the air compressor
and it has to be a lot beefier than the one that fills your tires.

That energy can be from renewable sources, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. thats no problem though
as they can be built as easy as the home owner model can, just takes a little more material to do it. It sounds like it would be the ideal car for us as we drive only few miles a day and so it would be possible for us to recharge the air tank during the night hours when a lot of electrical potential is going to waste
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Wind turbines seem perfect for this job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. The car is a concept
It is not energy efficeint and has a limited range. You still have to power an air compressor to operate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. "it is not energy efficient"? Do you even know what you are talking about? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Air compression is pretty inefficient, thermodynamically speaking.
Air compression is pretty inefficient, thermodynamically speaking.

The problem is that air heats up a lot as it's compressed
and unless you have something useful to do with that heat
(like store the air hot or heat your house with the waste
heat from the compressor), that heat just becomes energy
that is lost forever.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Uh, gee, I dont know anyone tht needs to offgas the hot air in order
To heat their homes. <sarcasm>

In fact, when we first rented an old farm house in damp and windy Sausalito California, we pulled the clothes dryer hose up from the crawl space, dusted it off, installed a paper filter to contain the lint, and used it to heat our kitchen in the winter months.

And remember, this technology has only been mentioned a tiny little bit here in the United States. Let some of our best scieintific minds toy with this concept, and we willnot only have the compressed air car's byproducts heating our homes in the winter but maybe adding energy to something else in the summer.

The Wright Brother's first few airplanes were dismal failures, but twelve years later, planes were flying from Germany to throw bombs at the Brits.

In any new application, a new technology's constraints can be reversed. If the new technology is encouraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. Burning gas is much more wasteful in terms of extra heat, and THAT heat
is wasted outside. Heat generated during compression in your garage/house can be used in your water heater or elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Not without undoing the work of the compressor
Compressing any gas in a closed container will also increase the temperature of the gas. Cooling the gas will also result in lowering the pressure, which is not what you're after in this scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. No, it's not.
> Burning gas is much more wasteful in terms of extra heat...

Surprisingly, no, it's not. All systems have some
ultimate Thermodynamic Efficiency that they can achieve
and if you look at the complete system for the compressed
air car, it achieves lousy thermodynamic efficiency when
compared to an internal combustion engine in a hybrid
automobile or a battery electric car.

The only situation where it might beat the ICE is if
the energy that compresses the air comes from a renewable
source like wind, solar, or hydro. But the battery electric
car still beats it by miles.

o http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamic_efficiency

o http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamics

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. My husband is studying this
He got some plans over the internet for making a compressed air motor. He says the concept is good, but not sure it would be easy to build or to convert a gasoline engine to compressed air. He does seem to think that using diving tanks made of carbon fiber would give one enough capacity to drive a vehicle for a limited range.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. totally different in the connecting rod and crank arrangment from an auto engine
it would be next to impossible to convert an auto engine over to air as there is no way to allow the piston to stay at the top for an extended time while the pressure builds and that is what the knee action connecting rod does and it do compares with an electric on range IIRC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. The cam timing has to be quite different and...
The cam/valve timing has to be quite different and the intake
manifold of an ordinary auto (Otto) engine or diesel isn't
built to run under much air pressure; even in a turbocharged
car it only operates at (say) 1.6x atmospheric pressure.

But the cam/valve timing seems like the real challange for
a Do-It-Yourselfer.

A small air turbine engine might be easier to create.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. click on Animation of the articulated con-rod and take note of the way the piston
http://www.theaircar.com/howitworks.html#

remains at the top for several degrees of crankshaft rotation and in that is what makes this motor what it is, nothing to do with timing its all in the articulated connecting rod.

Articulated con-rod

The MDI con-rod system allows the piston to be held at Top Dead Centre for 70° of the cycle.




This way, enough time is given to create the pressure in the cylinder. The torque is also better so the force exerted on the crankshaft is less substantial than in a classic system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Well, that's a bit disappointing for us backyard tinkerers.
Really doesn't look like a system that any existing engine block
could be converted to. :(

Fascinating bit of engineering, though. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. Tesha, check out this site. I'm convinced!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. I've seen the site. The compressed-air car is a perfect example of vaporware.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. More like "scamware"
as it were...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugar Smack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. What's a car car? And welcome.
And:pals: :yourock: And go, John, go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Isn't that a bird of some sort? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugar Smack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. GOD, Javaman!
Get a hobby!:* :hi: :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Sadly, DU IS my hobby....
:cry: LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Fart Cart?
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 03:29 PM by janeaustin

Dogs everywhere will rejoice when people "blame it on the car". :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugar Smack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. shreiking.
:rofl: God, we grab our levity wherever we can, & thanks.:D :pals: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. European countries are way way ahead of us.
but we need our oil fix huh???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. Link? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. This one has been in my favorites list for a couple years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. Let's see: No heat, no A/C, recharging much more expensive than promised
Let's see: No heat, no A/C (or else how are they powered?),
recharging much more expensive than promised, difficulties
safety certifying the very-high-pressure air tank, ...

Yeah, this still sounds just like the winner it sounded
like a year or two ago when this was first posted.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. Cool! I'll take one, even if it lacks comforts.
I wonder if you are running out of air can you just blow in the tank to get you to the next station?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. Every car runs on air.
Just because you don't get it at the pump doesn't mean your engine doesn't need it.


/Obviousman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. So does this one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. This has been around for a couple of years. Glad to see it wasn't shelved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
25. This thing keeps getting kicked around every few months
Unfortunately, the last anyone heard an update about the concept was in 2004. Since then, nothing. The original prototypes only got ~20 kilometers per charge, instead of the 200 km they were aiming for. There is no current production in India; the few working prototypes were built there, but there isn't an air-car factory cranking out Mini-CAT's on a daily basis. Then you have to look at the inefficiency of compressing air to charge the car. It is incredibly energy-wasteful to compress air (anyone who doesn't believe me, google "Boyle's Law").

Look at it like this: you generate electricity, charge batteries in an electric car with little energy loss due to heating, and you drive it. With a compressed-air car, you generate electricity, compress air with a large amount of energy loss due to heating, transfer that air into an air-car, with more loss of energy, and then drive it. Every time you transfer energy, you lose some of it. Air cars seem to add an unneeded step into the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. Pass
This car is far more dangerous than the normal car. Imagine if that compressed air tank got damaged in an accident? That would be like a bomb going off. As opposed to gas cars, which might catch fire, but that's it. (Cars don't blow up like they do in Hollywood.)

Plus its limited range and speed might work in urban area, but in areas like Alaska and Wyoming where the next major city is over 125 miles away, the thing is going to go over like a lead brick.

And there's the question of horsepower or how well it can go up inclines. Does it crap out on a 30 deg. hill? Does it run with an extra 200 lb.s of extra weight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. there was a story a few years ago about a plant filled tanks with
compressed gas that exploded. The some of the nozzles melted off the tanks and they took off like rockets.

could be a bit dicey in a car wreck but hell you would make it home in nothing flat! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7horses Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. Sorry ...
I stuttered on the word c-c-c-car car! haha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC