Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Q-Notes endorses John Edwards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:34 PM
Original message
Q-Notes endorses John Edwards




After a series of meetings between the editors, the staff and the publisher, Q-Notes has endorsed John Edwards for President.

Our method for arriving at this decision began late last summer with a simple question: who’s best on LGBT issues. In years past, this alone often narrowed the field to a single contender. This election cycle, however, has been decidedly different from years past.

Each of the Democrats vying for the nomination passed muster on our suitability test. They all support the Matthew Shepard Act and a transgender-inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act. They all oppose “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and the Defense of Marriage Act. They all back legal recognition of same-sex relationships.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich earned bonus points for being the only candidate to support full marriage rights. Again, this alone might have sealed the deal in previous elections. However, the stakes today are too high for that. Two terms of President George W. Bush have America teetering on the brink of economic collapse, while the disastrous “War on Terror” expands and our precious civil liberties shrink.

Under these conditions, viability trumps degrees of support. Following the Jan. 3 Iowa caucus, it was down to John Edwards and Hillary Clinton.


More: http://www.q-notes.com/top2008/top04_011208.html



FYI:Q-Notes is a Bi-weekly GLBT newspaper fro North and South Carolina
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlertLurker Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gotta LOVE garbage like this:
"Under these conditions, viability trumps degrees of support."

Translation: "Kucinich is clearly the better candidate, but Edwards has a shot at the nomination."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sometimes the truth hurts.
I'd love to see Kucinich as president, but it ain't going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's about as likely as Edwards as President at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm not going to disagree strongly, but disagree anyway.
Edwards is getting a lot more votes than Kucinich. I wouldn't mind seeing either of them as president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. But logically, Edwards doesn't have a chance.

I would LOVE to see Kucinich as president, but he doesn't have a chance at this point.

I wouldn't want Edwards anywhere near the oval office, but at this point, I don't have to worry about it because he is too far behind in popularity and money to compete on any serious level.


However, my point is that Edwards lack of viability makes their endorsement kinda strange, when they say that viability trumps and then they pick a candidate who is no longer viable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well, he seems to have good numbers in the next couple of states.
It's a wait and see game to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC