Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Las Vegas building boom expected to create 113,500 jobs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:00 AM
Original message
Las Vegas building boom expected to create 113,500 jobs
I am hoping this influx of working folks will help turn Nevada blue :)

====

Casino operators believe they will have no problem filling hotel rooms with guests and packing casinos with free-spending gamblers during the current building boom, which is expected to bring at least four new resorts to the Strip and an estimated 45,000 more hotel rooms to the Las Vegas market by 2012.

Finding enough employees to clean the rooms, work the restaurants and staff the casinos may not be as easy.

Deutsche Bank Securities, in a report to its investors, said the Las Vegas casino industry will need to hire some 113,500 workers for the positions being created by the new resorts. Analysts for the Wall Street investment house believe if the current growth rate in Clark County's population continues unabated, there will be a shortfall of some 25,000 jobs left unfilled...

Meanwhile, MGM Mirage is already taking steps to staff 12,000 positions at Project CityCenter, which covers the hotel-casino and Vdara condo tower.

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2007/Feb-19-Mon-2007/business/12603617.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. They're going to need 213,500 to move all them people out
when the water runs out in a few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well that's cheerful.
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 12:05 AM by Bluebear


New resources do need to be considered, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. New resources like what?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Desalinization for example
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I'm not going to hold my breath on that
The desalination plant in Santa Barbara has been totally idle since it was built in 1992. It's estimated that if it came online, water prices could be over $1,100 per acre foot, versus $270 per acre foot from the state, and much less than that for local sources. Half of the parts were sold off a few years ago. It's currently drydocked, with all the components needing frequent replacement removed. If it came online, it could produce 3,000 acre feet per year.

One acre foot is roughly the amount needed by a family of four for a year. There are 200,000 people in the metropolitan area. If you assume that people in the area live in households of four (which is a totally ridiculous assumption), then the area needs 50,000 acre feet per year. The desalination plant would therefore provide 6% of the city's water needs.

Right now it's much, much cheaper and easier to get water from the state water project.

http://www.santabarbaraca.gov/Government/Departments/PW/SupplySources.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porcupine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Please read your sig line.
There is nothing to desalinize in Las Vegas. It's on a plataeu hundreds of miles from the nearest coast.

Optimism DOES NOT CREATE REALITY. That is why you can kep scimming money off stupid tourists. You really need to move to a place with a higher sanity quotient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Please educate yourself on the topic before correcting folks
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 04:27 AM by Bluebear
See the post above yours re: Santa Barbara desalinization plant. Nobody is suggesting to desalinize anything in the desert.

And don't tell me where I "need" to move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
34. YOU need to study up on a topic more before you open your mouth and proove you're an idiot!
Try this one on for a bit:

Nevadans would OWN a desalinization plant on the ocean and sell the fresh water it produced in trade for water produced elsewhere, or even consider having a pipiline constructed to bring the water directly to Nevada.

One doesn't have to be acutally ON HTE OCEAN shoreline to make practical use of such a thing.

But I bet creative thinking - or ANY thinking isn't exactly YOUR strong point.

Now, presently, it is not YET economical to do so, but it might be so in the near future.

Other countries successfully do use such plants, and it is economical for them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The map says it all
I'm not trying to piss in anybody's cornflakes but it is right in the middle of the effing desert for chrissakes. They rely heavily on over appropriated Colorado River water that is also claimed by AZ and CA under an overly optimistic estimate of river flows made in 1923. It's all going to wind up in court some day and Vegas, Phoenix and So Cal are all going to get slapped upside the head. Betcha a few golf courses will go under and water rates will skyrocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. they are taking our water from up north
trying to devastate valleys of family ranches that have been here for a century.

My folks live in Vegas and complain about having to water only on even days for the first time in 50 yrs....while us folk up north have had to conserve always. State capital deemed my commercial "condo association" to only have gravel with a few shrubs over 40 acres...but southern NV can do whatever they hell they want....don't get me started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. (I'm sorry I mentioned this topic :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. Las Vegas means "The Meadows"
grew up there and the name fit in the old days...artesian wells bubbling out of the ground everywhere. It's all gone now and Lake Mead is down to unheard of levels...yet they keep building!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
35. And CA and AZ have been OVER USING their "share" for decades now...
and Nevadans WILL reclaim the water that CA and AZ have ILLEGALLY used WITHOUT penalty for years.

And Nevadans have ALREADY won in the courts, and have FORCED AZ and CA to bank water for Nevadans' future use requirements...

Incidentally, the water flows FROM Nevada INTO California, so I don't think Nevad would have ANY problems in enforcing the law if it came to that point, which I doubt.

because AZ, NV & CA have already come to an agreement for water use...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. The "upper basin" states want their fair share too (CO, NM, UT)
they are experiencing explosive growth in these mountain states and if they get the appropriations they want there won't be jack shit left over for the "lower basin" of NV, AZ and CA. The problem was when the original agreement was made to divvy up the water only CA had the population base and the resources to build the canals to utilize their allotment. Not only that but the original allocations were based on pie in the sky estimates of annual river flows which have rarely been met in over three quarters of a century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. Agreed it's going to be a disaster.
Blinders on everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porcupine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Las Vegas is the "vatican city" of human stupidity.
Ground Zero for the terminally dumb. A city whose greatest economic asset is the ability for people to fly in using scarce fossil fuels and lose money gambling. The very existence of the city relies upon a very poor understanding of math.

Add to this colossal handicap the fact that living there is entirely dependent upon cheap AC, trucking, airfreight, building materials and water piped from the bottom of a canyon. The only native resource the city has is gravel.

Summer temperatures top 120 degrees; frequently.

And people flock there like it was the land of milk and honey.

The place will be a temple to stupidity in truth someday. It's the Auschwitz of climate change. A place utterly dependant of GHG release.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. You've summed up my feelings exactly
Las Vegas IS a monument to human stupidity.

Their own public broadcasting magazine admitted a few years ago that the city is using water at 130% of sustainability, and they want to add 113,000 more people?

:crazy:

Well, I guess moving there will be its own punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. OK OK, then forget the sentiment about turning the state blue
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 04:29 AM by Bluebear
Since all of us who live there are so stupid, why bother?

Honestly, can one even start a topic anymore without people chiming in and giving their negative opinion on where you live, where you work, etc.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. On a lighter note, I have heard predictions that the Great Lakes
area will become the OPEC of fresh water in the decades to come. ;)

Hey, we in the upper MidWest have to have something to look forward to, other than bad weather and declining populations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. It's a valid sentiment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Nevada currently only has 4 electoral votes
Minimizing emigration would lessen the red state effect, and in any case Las Vegas has poor turn out relative the rest of the state. How else to you explain (besides fraud) the state going for Bush in 2004 after he promised to turn the state into a nuclear waste dump?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. The really "blue" thing to do for Nevada would be not to support
the importation of more people than its eco-system can tolerate.

What's so "blue" about overloading the fragile desert environment and using up the little water that it has for hotel fountain displays and swimming pools?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. What do you Minnesotans do to the atmosphere heating your homes every year?
And plugging in your cars so they will start because your ancestors chose to build communities on a frozen lutefisk tundra? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. About as much as Las Vegas spends on air conditioning
both buildings and cars.

(We plug in our cars only when it's more than -20°, which hardly ever happens anymore.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
36. Umm - ever hear of "recycling"? The water isn't constantly poured in and the drained away...
hasn't been for a LONG time now...

And almost all the golf courses now use brown water and are removing most of their "grasses" areas.

You know nothing about the topic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. Everyone's an expert, TLV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. So why did your own public radio magazine say that Las Vegas is
using water at 130% of capacity?

And does it really make sense to add 113,000 more people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. People here are overly harsh
But I think there is a larger issue at stake in the growth of Vegas than simply "turning the state blue."

My understanding is that the friggin' contractors have told the county commissoners to slow down, because the city simply can't handle the growth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. and I sure hope the Great Lakes area holds onto the water they
have and not go selling to the highest bidder. Pun intended. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. I've never been there....
and have no desire to go.

People are always talking about how great it is. Whatever. WHY would I want to go and see some pre-fab version of the pyramids or the Eiffel Tower when I could go see the real thing?

We fucking Americans have no idea of culture-- we just figure we can build our own duplicates and they'll be as good as the original. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. "GHG release" What's that? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Green House Gases
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
44. Yes. Kunstler mentions Vegas about every talk he gives. Totally
dependent on a scarce and declining water and fossil fuel supplies... People will look back and wonder just wtf we were thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'd rather die than to have to live out there. However, there seem
to be plenty of others who disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
23. While I understand your sentiments about hoping an influx will
turn your area blue, I have to say building up Las Vegas even more is, well, cuckoo.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
24. I used to be a camera assistant in commercials. we would shoot in veges...
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 10:23 AM by Javaman
And I will tell you know how I made a bundle and it wasn't by gambling.

each crew member would get a meal stipend for lunch and dinner.

However, most of them never ate and used the money to gamble.

I don't like to gamble and find it a complete waste.

So at the end of the first day, most of the crew was broke.

I on the other hand was still liquid.

So I started lending out money. at a 20% return based on their winnings.

Some won big some lost bad, in the end, I walked away with 5k extra in my pocket. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
26. I enjoyed visiting Vegas back when it was small
But that's been over 25 years. People tell me I would hate it today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
27. Vegas needs to seriously evaluate how big it wants to get
The smog problem is getting worse by the year. The water situation is alarming.

And from a strictly logistical standpoint, McCarren Airport can't handle the tourists who come already.

Still....I love the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. They will have another airport in 10 years in Jean...
We ARE on top of the situation....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. You need a new one tomorrow though.
I can't imagine how bad it will be in ten years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formerrepuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. Great- just as long as they all bring their own water supply with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
32. And cost us gawd knows what in destructive sprawl.
We are screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
39. Las Vegas needs to have an organized plan for growth, or it will become the next Los Angeles.
They need a plan for growth that is not only environmentally conscious but economically sustainable in light of dwindling oil reserves worldwide and limited water supplies regionally. You simply can't expect to build things far apart anymore without consuming more fossil fuels. They must have a mass transit system in place to alleviate the traffic and reduce pollution, and they must find new sources of water or face having to take water away from everybody else living nearby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
43. Poor Bluebear
Threads can really go awry, can't they? I suppose you have to thank your stars that the LouDobbs folks haven't chimed in (yet) with something like "Yes, but illegals will steal every one of those 113,500 jobs!" :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. The water level of Lake Mead is down 83 feet in 6 years
That is something worth being concerned about more than electoral politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC