Freepers in a TIZZY about the NIE. Just sick over it.

[MidwestTransplant]

They have people claiming it was written by elements hostile to the Bush admin. in the State Department never mind that it was the CONSENSUS of 16 intelligence agencies. No dissenters like there were in the Iraq bullshit NIE. They are just sick about it. Calling the CIA treasonous, etc. Too funny.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1934878/posts

Oh and here is a gem by Newsmax
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1934735/posts They claim to have sources in Iran.

[Bicoastal]

1. Tell me about it...

....I went on FR and found someone saying "Hey, if our intelligence turned out be wrong on Iraq having WMD's, how do we know they're right about Iran NOT having them?"

:crazy:

[HughMoran]

3. Ahh, it's the old "double negative" intelligence phenomenon.

:rofl:

[Bicoastal]

6. The operative word being "intelligence."

Translation:

"WAAAAAAAH! Don't take our shiny pretty war away from us!!"

[HughMoran]

8. You caught the double entendre

:rofl:

[HughMoran]

2. Poor morans!!11! This is a HUGH!!11 story and they are suffering badly

I have great sympathy for them - it is expressed in the following smiley :rofl:

[lpbk2713]

5. Fuggem.

If they think things are bad now, let em wait till January, 2009.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

[HughMoran]

7. That's a very sad looking child

lmao! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!

:rofl:

[Sen. Walter Sobchak]

26. that picture needs something,

like Mark Foley and Larry Craig standing behind him with their creepy smiles.

[malaise]

29. Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah

:rofl:

[sandnsea]

4. Some of our own Democrats

are sick over it too.

[Azathoth]

9. Joe McCarthy to the rescue!

To: jveritas
Anything that comes out of the State Department is BS. Joe McCarthy where are you now that we need you?

45 posted on 12/04/2007 10:24:19 PM PST by pankot
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies >

[Bicoastal]

11. It's the work of Islamofascismocommunists, I tells ya!

I knew it was them all along! <hic>

[lpbk2713]

13. There's an element of truth in the first part of that statement ....

CONdi always has been full of shit up to her eyebrows.

[Azathoth]

14. Well, I wouldn't mind watching Joe McCarthy interrogate Condi

The two of them could sit there and accuse each other of treason for hours. :)

[HughMoran]

15. omg!

I can just visualize that! Is there a way to vote for a DUZY award?

:rofl:

[MidwestTransplant]

17. I am sure Joe would have some other names for her besides traitor.

[HughMoran]

22. no you didn't!

(in the sisterly vernacular)

[rAVES]

10. jveritas the freeper says:

IMO, this is push back by liberals trying to stop GW from taking out Iran’s nuke facilities. Problem is this will come back to haunt the dems in the long run.

I love that... "the Liberals"

[rAVES]

12. Oh man... What planet is jrooney living on....

"What a huge and worthless embarrassment the CIA has become."

:rofl:

edit added " "

[MidwestTransplant]

16. Oh and the 15 other spy agencies. Surely a ploy by the liberals. Drat foiled again.

[Richard Steele]

18. The irony is: it's the USA's LIBERAL policies which enable idjits like this to survive to adulthood,

...and give them the ability to go online and express their "viewpoints"
(I do not use the word "thoughts") on an equal footing with the US citizens
who actually have enough brain cells to establish and maintain the systems
that allow such simple-minded, hate-based little troglodytes to be more
than illiterate grunt-laborers who spend their evenings squatting in ditches
eating rats and passing a sister or two around the ol' dungfire.



I'm Richard Steele, and I approved this run-on sentence!

[cboy4]

19. Boy, that website is an embarrassment to the

internets.

I mean, the people are dumb as a rock stupid to begin with.

And then factor in how the website is all very text-based and extremely hard to read.

Very 1980.

And very embarrassing.

[lpbk2713]

21. They have to keep the FR website as simple as possible.

If it was any more complicated the 'short bus' FR members who go there would be unable to use it.

[Contrary1]

20. And we are the "moonbats"? n/t

[orleans]

23. lockjaw! lockjaw! (don't those freeps ever get tired of sucking george off?) n/t

[cboy4]

24. The simple answer is no. They love it.

:puke:

[orleans]

25. (oh god...i thought my question was disgusting, but your answer is

even worse! my problem is that i get these vivid literal pictures going in my imagination and end up making myself queezy...etch...)

[radfringe]

27. heard one idiot on Randi Rhodes

try to say that since Iran no longer has nuke program that bush's diplomacy worked.. :eyes:

they shut it down in 2003, if bush's diplomacy worked then why was bush/cheney doing the booga-booga about Iranian nukes between 2003 and now? seems to me the time to crow about diplomacy would have been back in 2003 when the freaking program was shut down - not after 4 years of booga-booga

then he went on to say we shouldn't take Iran's word that they did in fact shut down the nuke program... :wtf:

we aren't taking Iran's word - we're taking the word of OUR intel report..

next he tried to say that Iran "HID" the nuke program...and if they hid it once they can hide it again...

:headbang: yeah, they hid it so well even they couldn't find it...

he ended by saying he was going to vote democratic so he can sit back and watch the dems screw things up, then after 4 years the repubs would be back in power...

:freak:

[Reno.Muse]

28. The intelligence community has been fecked by the Bush administration

in the past. They took a stand.

[malaise]

30. GW did do a good job today.

I stopped after that comment. They are morans from the 'breading pool'.