Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One thing to keep in mind about the McClellan statement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 08:55 PM
Original message
One thing to keep in mind about the McClellan statement
I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest ranking officials in the administration were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice President, the President's chief of staff, and the President himself.


This statement clearly implies that McClellan's superiors were behind the lying to the American public. Now McClellan's publisher is trying to back-track. But we have to remember, this wasn't some off the cuff statement that a reporter overheard. This was a passage from a book written by Scott McClellan. It was written, and re-written, and edited, and vetted. This statement was carefully thought out and carefully worded. I still believe that there is more to the story than the publisher is letting on. If McClellan wanted to exonerate Bush and Cheney, he wouldn't have worded that passage like he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Its really strange that he would come out with this, given his supposed...
feelings for the President... Hmmmmmm Certainly makes one scratch there head in wonderment....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. This is exactly why he quit.
As goofy and evasive as McClellan was in his role as Press Secretary, he made every to either tell the truth or saying nothing at all. (This is in stark contrast to Ari Fleischer who lied endlessly and Tony Snow who simply made stuff up). When McClellan found that he was simply a tool in the Admin Lie Machine, he quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Precisely!
It wasn't off-the-cuff and, as you say, was written, re-written, edited and vetted.

The current back-tracking just smacks of a desperate desire to unring a bell that has already rung - loud and clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Which begs the question..
If they were going to ring it that strongly what made them try to unring it after it was already rung loud and clear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. " . . . and the President HIMSELF."

The HIMSELF is there precisely to emphasize the word President.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Exactly what I was thinking.
Now he's going to say Bush was "involved," but not say how? I.e., that he told Scotty to pass along information he knew was false when he asked him to pass it along?

I smell the distinct odor of backpedaling bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emanymton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. This Is A Teaser. Designed To Increase Sales. `````
.

Wordsmith. Don't get your hopes up. No information will be coming out. In the end he implies, hoping others will infer. Then he will deny.

Standard tactic to hype book sales!
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Accusing the Pres. & VP of perjury is a "standard tactic?"
Hmmmmm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emanymton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. In The Teaser He Implies. What You Infer Is Up To You.
Edited on Wed Nov-21-07 09:14 PM by emanymton
.
He knows it and has 'made his bones' playing this game. He will parse his own statements. He has said what he knows what you want to hear.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No inference needed.
The words mean what they mean.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Perjury is lying under oath; I don't think there is an accusation
of perjury in that statement. I don't think this is going to amount to anything in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Okay--of intentionally lying to the American people and encouraging
others to cover up the lies.

Of outing a CIA agent for political gain.

However you'd like to slice it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. I don't think his statements "implied" anything. He said straight out
that he was given false information. He name five men who did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Correct. That passage had to pass through a multitude of filters and edits.
To think anything different would be incredibly naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Not only that, but what did he think would happen when this statment was made public?
He (Scotty) had to know that there would soon be a shit storm to follow.

Something is rotten in Denmark...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe Scott wrote it that way unknowingly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Scott McClellan is the son of Barr McClellan, who names LBJ in JFK coup ----
Family
Born in Austin, Texas, McClellan is the youngest son of Carole Keeton Strayhorn, former Texas state comptroller and former 2006 independent Texas gubernatorial candidate, and attorney Barr McClellan. McClellan's brother Mark McClellan headed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and formerly was Commissioner for the Food and Drug Administration. McClellan is the grandson of the late W. Page Keeton, longtime Dean of the University of Texas School of Law and renowned expert in tort law.

-----------

As Madelaine Brown --- LBJ's mistress --- makes clear ---
LBJ was plotting the assassination for two years ---
Of course, there were a large circle of allies ---

Barr McClellan's book is "Blood, Money & Power" --
"How LBJ Killed JFK" ---

by noted LBJ authority and Personal Attorney Barr McClellan

Barr McClellan's story was also included in "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" series --- the final episodes --- which seem to have been destroyed.

Additionally, A&E also ran a documentary around the same time on the Tunnheim Panel ---
the 1992 JFK Assassination Classified Records Act set up by Clinton ---
and he confirmed that the panel had concluded that . . .

"OSWALD WAS EMPLOYED BY THE CIA WORKING ON HIGH LEVEL ASSIGNMENTS AND PROBABLY ALSO FOR THE FBI."

Tunnheim repeats this twice at the end of the documentary ---
with the TEXT appearing below as he speaks.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. The book can't have been vetted--it hasn't been completed.
And do you honestly think the passage would still be in the book if it HAD been vetted? I think Scotty's hoping to stir up a little trouble here--and NOT simply in order to sell his book.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC