Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Al Gore ran as an independent in 2008, would he be a spoiler?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:01 PM
Original message
Poll question: If Al Gore ran as an independent in 2008, would he be a spoiler?
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 02:02 PM by 0rganism
Scenario: Al Gore declares an independent presidential candidacy, running against both Democratic and Republican nominees in the general election.
Question: Is Al Gore a "spoiler"?
(use dictionary.com's #6: spoil·er -noun ... 6. any competitor, entrant, or candidate who has no chance of ultimate victory but does well enough to spoil the chances of another.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Spoiler is right
Another one of these fucking polls and my lunch is coming back up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, when it does be sure to post it so DU can pick it apart.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. As suspected, the NO's are winning in your poll... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Interesting that a plurality thinks Gore would win
I'm glad I put that in as an option, as it seems to be the accepted rationale for Gore's exemption. If he lost, would the Democratic candidate be considered the spoiler? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. An Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Rudy race would be won by Rudy
It would be just like 1912 when TR challenged Taft and allowed Wilson to win with 43% or would be like 1992 when Perot got 19% and Clinton won with 43%. The only question is who would come in third--Clinton or Gore. People here on DU think that Clinton would be a sure loser, but in actuality she has a lot of Democratic support around the country. The Democratic vote would be split--allowing a Republican--any Republican to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's what I think....Gore and Hill (or any other Dem) would split the vote.
We can only hope Bloomberg runs to split the GOP vote :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That only happened after Teddy Roosevelt made the mistake
of endorsing his more conservative Secretary of War Taft for the Presidency, instead of running for reelection him self, after Taft came to power, Roosevelt lost faith in him as Taft became too conservative for Roosevelt's taste. This is one of my fears should Al Gore sit this one out or not be drafted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes, TR ruled himself out for 1908 because of the supposed "third term" thing
even though he actually was elected to one term on his own right in 1904. He later regretted doing this. But had he run in 1908 it would have been as a Republican not a bull-mooser and he surely would have won as a Republican by a bigger margin than even Taft did in '04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I agree except for 04 at the end of your post,
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 02:36 PM by Uncle Joe
should be 08.

Edit for P.S. Of course it wasn't illegal to run for a third term until after F.D.R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC