|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 01:49 PM Original message |
Does anyone here REALLY understand a Two Party System? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well in a way I agree with you buttttttt, I don't want to eat dlc shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. I DON'T WANT TO EAT DLC SHIT EITHER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Devlzown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. If I had my way, we would have a Parliamentary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. I suggest you start the Constitutional Amendment RIGHT AWAY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Devlzown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. It would take a little more than an amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
34. There is *NOTHING* in the Constitution about a two-party Congress. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RebelSansCause (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. we can't have more than a 2 party system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Devlzown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Third parties cause civil wars? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stranger81 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. we had prominent third and fourth parties in this country well into the 20th century. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. The last viable third party fizzled out almost 80 years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RebelSansCause (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. yes it had two sides |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. Bohner is a Republican. But I generally agree with your post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Sorry. I'm really pissed off and even I forget on occasion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. You mean Hoyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I changed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. I tried calling Congress RIGHT FUCKING NOW last week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think I remember one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. I believe I do. It's why I'm extremely Democratic Party loyal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. I'm a SOCIALIST, but I support the Party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. I don't know about that. I don't follow your posts patricularly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Why not? I'm a Realist, as are most Socialists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
7. I still think they represent the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. I have four words for you: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
10. Let's say, for instance, that the Greens won 15 seats in the house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Will they work in 2008? I repeat the four most dangerous words in politics today: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
11. Well they've failed miserably then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. I'll repeat those words again: Thomas, Roberts, Alito, Scalia. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. May I remind you that Roberts and Scalia were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Do you remember the words "Nuclear Option?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. My, are we a quivering mass of jelly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 05:38 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Enjoy your war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
22. I do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Don't pick nits; it's unattractive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. Easy, Tyler-please don't smash my face in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 05:47 AM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Truce. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. I knew I had spelled it correctly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. You can't get too deep here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stranger81 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
25. I really think this is a myth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. It isn't what it should be, it is what it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stranger81 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:50 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. or maybe a socialist party! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 01:09 PM Response to Reply #33 |
44. Works for me Comrade. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
27. ttt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
37. You do realize that a third party can become a major party fairly easily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indi Guy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 05:42 AM Response to Original message |
40. There is no "two party system" anymore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
42. Perhaps some of us understand it well enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Absolutely no disagreement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 07:57 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. I understand your points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Frankly, I don't believe it EITHER. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
47. Damn DLC! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
50. Supporting DLC = Supporting PNAC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
51. The DLC are RESPONSIBLE for the fractured party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 05:01 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC