Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If a train traveling from Point A to Point B at 240 mph never gets built, how long will it take...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:35 PM
Original message
If a train traveling from Point A to Point B at 240 mph never gets built, how long will it take...

Here we (don't) go again

Math quiz:

Q: If a train traveling from Point A to Point B at 240 mph never gets built, how long will it take you to reach your destination?

A: 42 years and counting.

During the Commerce, Science and Transportation hearing the other day, Sen. Kerry mentioned Maglev as a high speed rail option that's being used in Japan and China, and he asked Sec. Peters why the administration has done nothing to advance similar technology here at home. Her answer, I believe, was "We are looking at it very hard."

Maglev and similar technologies are not just a solution to overcrowded highways, but would also address environmental issues, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and restore our standing as a technology leader. Because with respect to transportation technology, we're not even close. Oh, we can build it alright. We know how. We just can't seem to cut through all the red tape and get it implemented. As the Senator says, it's shameful.

I mentioned when I posted about the hearing the other day that, as a child, I recalled witnessing a prototype of a light rail system in my home town of Pittsburgh.

It's amazing what you can find on youtube.

(Video: http://www.kerryvision.net">Pittsburgh Skybus 1967)

The title says 1967, but I think it was actually 1965 when Skybus made its debut at South Park Fairgrounds, about a mile from my house. I was six. You can do the math, but it's not part of the quiz, and I'd really rather you didn't.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're waiting for the infallible free market to build it.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. In 1962 the Seattle Monorail was called the rail of the future. Still waiting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. California
700 miles of subway, elevated, light and commuter rail built in the Los Angeles area in just 20 years. It is possible. Mass transit now available in LA, Long Beach, Riverside, San Berdoo, OC, San Diego, San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose, Sacramento, Stockton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I live 2 and a half hours from the Bay area.
Was telling a friend that lives in S.F. that I wished we had a bullet train from where I live into the heart of San Francisco.

"But, Carol, you'd have to pay like twenty dolalrs for a ticket!"

I'd gladly do it. I pay $ 23 for gas if I use my car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. PAC's and oil companies will not allow it . They control the direction of our gov't
silly! :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmageddon Donating Member (596 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. We're spending money in Iraq so we don't have to spend it here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC