|
Edited on Sun Oct-14-07 01:28 PM by Peace Patriot
transparency of the voting system. The poster (someone who knows Costa Rica well) said that the unions and other anti-CAFTA forces were prepared with many hundreds of volunteers to monitor the polls--but was unclear about the METHOD of vote counting. I have since found out that Costa Rica has electronic voting machines, but I'm having a hard time finding details on the internet. AT&T and Unisys were initially involved in electronic voting development in Costa Rica.
This may be the problem (with the CAFTA vote). How it works here is that corporations privatized the vote counting--with a $3.9 billion electronic voting boondoggle from the Anthrax Congress--by selling the state/county governments voting systems run on 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY programming code, owned and controlled by rightwing corporations--code so secret that not even our secretaries of state are permitted to review it--with virtually no audit/recount controls. The U.S. vote counting system was thus made completely riggable--one hacker, a couple of minutes, leaving no trace, that's all it takes. THEN, the corporate news monopolies--with Karl Rove feeding the corporate news monopolies their copy--started creating a plausible narrative for the triumph of the corporate, or associated far rightwing, cause, or candidate (Bush/Cheney, war, looting the federal government, "free trade," anti-gay marriage) at the polls. They manipulate pre-election polls, and they outright doctor exit polls (U.S.A.--2004) to support this plausible narrative. They thus demoralize the opposition--they get in your head, so that YOU start repeating parts of their plausible narrative--and may actually reduce the vote by this method, although it doesn't matter if they affect actual votes--they have direct, secret code control of the outcome: their main purpose is to deflect suspicion that votes have been switched or 'disappeared.'
That's the basic system. They pour multi-millions into advertising (brainwashing) both to change votes and to demoralize opposition voters, but also--very importantly--to support the feasible narrative that the candidate or cause, that is so obviously BAD for most people, is actually 'winning,' and/or to make it appear to be so close that stealing it, electronically, will not raise eyebrows. (I'm sure they did this in 2004. I don't think it was even close between Bush and Kerry. I think Kerry won by a landslide.)
I don't know which of the election theft corporations is active in Costa Rica. Nor do I know for certain what Costa Rica's system is or that the CAFTA vote was outright stolen. But when I heard that the votes were tabulated electronically, all red flags went up.
Privatized vote counting with "trade secret code" is the biggest scam in the history of democracy, and all such systems are highly vulnerable to insider tampering, with or without a "paper trail." The ONLY way to verify such an "election" is with a significant audit--say in the 55% range (as they have in Venezuela*). But these private election theft corporations lobby heavily and successfully either for no audit at all (paperless voting machines--no recount possible), or for a very minimal and manipulable audit (like the 1% audit in some states in the U.S.--with many states having ZERO audit). So even if Costa Rica has a paper trail, the "election" can still be EASILY stolen.
The safest verification is paper ballots hand-counted IN PUBLIC, with results posted immediately in a public place.
The CAFTA vote may have been a combination of U.S. (and 'Democratic' Party) threats, the propaganda blast (the feasible narrative), and switching and 'disappearing' votes. Costa Rica doesn't seem to have the additional blatant vote suppression against poor and minority voters, such as we have seen in Ohio and Florida (needed to keep George Bush in office in 2004, in ADDITION to "trade secret" vote counting). It appears that Costa Ricans are more vigilant than we are, and do not let things like that happen. But no one can be vigilant against 'TRADE SECRET' vote counting. You can't SEE it. And it is very difficult to detect.** It's the perfect system for establishing and cementing fascist power.
------------------
*Venezuela uses electronic voting, but they have an OPEN SOURCE CODE system--anyone may review the code by which the votes are tabulated--and they hand-count a whopping 55% of the votes as a check on machine fraud. These are the only circumstances in which electronic voting should be permitted--open source code, a voter-verified ballot, and a significant hand-count. (Our 0% to 1% audit is a joke.) (Not funny, though.)
**See www.truthisall.net for an awesome analysis of the 2004 election, based on the discrepancy between the exit polls (Kerry won)--before the exit polls were doctored by the corporate news networks, to force them to fit the results of Diebold/ES&s's "trade secret" formulae (Bush won). Combined with other evidence--such as the Democratic grass roots blowout success over the Bushites in new voter registration in 2004, nearly 60/40--it is an overwhelming case for a stolen 2004 election. And when you figure this fraudulent e-voting system was still in place in 2006, maybe that explains how a 'Democratic' Congress, with a breathtaking SEVENTY PERCENT anti-war mandate from the American people could, instead, escalate the war, re-fund it with $100 billion in supplemental (borrowed) money, and give Bush/Cheney more spying powers. In Costa Rica, the anti-CAFTA majority stood at about 80%, last I heard. That's why I suspect an electronically stolen election--but we need more info on their system.
----------------------------------------------------
EDITED: To take back the part, above, about "Democratic threats" against Costa Rica. There were no such threats, as investigators here have shown. Pelosi and Reid did NOT threaten Costa Rica. It was BUSH JUNTA threats only--which Pelosi and Reid publicly opposed.
My last paragraph, above (just before the footnotes) should read:
"The CAFTA vote may have been a combination of U.S./BUSHITE threats, the propaganda blast (the feasible narrative), and switching and 'disappearing' votes."
|