|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:09 AM Original message |
If the Democrats don't win in 2008, Roe V. Wade WILL BE OVER-RULED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. Um, if the Dems still control the Senate, why would they allow nomination of an anti-choice judge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. The same reason that a GOP Senate allowed two pro choice judges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Because he'll appear with his wife and kids, and his wife will cry, and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:53 AM Response to Reply #1 |
15. Because they're a bunch of spineless enablers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
36. So the repukes were spineless enablers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
29. You are correct, they knew that these judges belonged to the Federalist Society |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 11:46 AM Response to Reply #1 |
31. Seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 09:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
61. The same Dems who allowed FISA to pass? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
3. All according to plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
20. Guy, we're very well aware of all of it here. You just haven't been here long. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
5. Roe v Wade will be the law as long as the neocons think they need the fundies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
21. Yep. Roe v. Wade is rapidly becoming their only defense--and fundraiser, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
6. They can overturn Roe v Wade now. But they won't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. i tend to agree with this...the guys who actually run the party don't really care about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katherine Brengle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
63. Oh, they care - it's not just about abortion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:30 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I agree. The GOP had majorities in BOTH houses. 7 out of 9 judges were appointed by Repubs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. That's Because Pugs Used To Nominate Centrists And Center Right Judges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:55 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. You missed my point. Never mind. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. I didn't miss your point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 11:06 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Well, if you want to believe in the boogeyman, you can. n/.t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. How Is It A Boogeyman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
38. Let's look at that carefully. Many times in the past, presidents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:05 PM Response to Reply #38 |
49. They Didn't Vet Justices The Way They Vet Justices Now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:36 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. They Have Four |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. ....and don't forget Griswold. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Ha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. And birth control pills. And the others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:57 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. They Might Try To Outlaw The "Withdrawl Method" Too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
33. Oh, probably. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 11:02 AM Response to Reply #11 |
23. They've already overturned, what? Brown vs. BoE with merely a whimper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. No, they still need Stevens to die/retire. They have 4 (nm) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
37. uh, wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. What cali said. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
48. You are wrong on both accounts. In 1992 we Roe was almost overturned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
8. If we need fear to motivate Democrats to the polls then so be it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
10. if the dems don't win in 2008 we can all pack it in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
22. The republicans don't ever want to see abortion completely illegal.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
42. The republican may not, but they no longer have control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
24. pssst....here's what I'm worried about --- the Supreme Court is NOW pro-business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CK_John (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
27. I put this in the same category as the draft, maybe we need this to wake up the sheep. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. What the Democrats should say is at the minimum they support Justice O'conner view on Roe /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
32. Unless Giuliani wins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #32 |
53. Giuliani Said He Would Appoint Strict Constructionists To The Court In The Mold Of Scalia and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
34. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
35. SCOTUS gave Shrub his illegitimate Presidency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
39. Many Democrats don't care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
41. We go around in circles on abortion just like the Freepers go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #41 |
58. How Is Choice And Gay Rights Tiresome? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. It's not the subjects that are tiresome. It's the arguments for and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
43. Women's CHOICE is *part* of a larger problem ---> Perpetual War. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. They are both important, however consider this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
45. This is really odd....but I was thinking about the issue of abortion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 05:59 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. and that includes civil rights also. There is no excuse for anyone sitting out this election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. I feel some days like I am in some time warp.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:13 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. so do I. Hang in there, I think we will win both house and the executive branch /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:22 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Boy, do I ever hope you are right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
weeve (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
46. 8 - 1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. If Hillary wins the nomination, and her appointments reflect an anti-abortion stand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
50. Not a chance in hell. R v W will never be overturned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
56. Well-known Casey vs. Unknown Unfortunately-named (think about it) Penacchio = |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
57. It sure would be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pushed To The Left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
59. The most pro-choice thing a voter can do is to support the Democratic candidate in 2008! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katherine Brengle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
62. It's part of their greater plan - if they kill Roe, they'll be able to kill privacy, and if they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
64. There are certain candidates who will throw anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
65. Deleted message |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC