Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democracy Requires An Informed Populace

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 03:33 PM
Original message
Democracy Requires An Informed Populace
That's the long and short of it. When nearly all sources of information are suspect, particularly those broadcast into nearly every home, democracy is rendered all but impossible. When "news" becomes distraction or spin, when the REAL issues of the day are hidden behind lies, half-truths, or deceptive double-speak, any hope of real citizen involvement becomes little more than a forgotten ideal.

The biggest barrier between the United States and a truly functional democracy at this point is NOT government secrecy, or self-censorship, but a news media that refuses to function as it was intended to function--as a source of information for the citizens to rely upon to make good choices.

Simply put, the corporate media is a blight upon our Democracy. It sells itself to the highest bidder, and panders to the least responsible elements in our society. It turns our public airwaves into a source of gossip, innuendo, and irrelevant garbage rather than valuable, coherent information.

Media consolidation is part of the problem. But it is not the whole source of the problem. Another part is simply the sheer power of advertising dollars, whereupon those who PAY for the news get to subtly manipulate what the people hear.

There was once a time when the news was broadcast as a public service, not as a revenue stream for the networks. When it was actually information we needed, not just another source of entertainment.

Our only unfettered source of information these days is the internet and, because of its very nature, it can hardly be called reliable. Sure, a great deal of what we see here IS reliable, but it does not, by itself, consitute "proof" of anything. When it comes to politics, sites are generally labeled "right wing" or "left wing" and, while the corporate media can be prompted to run a story after it's had too much exposure on-line to be ignored, there are far too many people who regard internet sources as suspect.

Sometimes with good reason.

To reclaim our democracy, we must first reclaim our media. And that's an uphill battle, since it seems that most of our elected representatives are either ignorant of, or beholden to, the very interests that determine what the majority of Americans see and hear.

And even the freedom of the internet is being threatened by corporate interests. They try to paint any attempt at regulation as a "threat" to it, when, in all reality, if it's left to the corporations, they're certainly going to threaten the equal access currently granted to the various sites.

Opposition to net neutrality is just another cog in the wheel of corporate control of information that's currently grinding our democracy into so much dust.

We'd better figure out a way to fight back, and do so effectively, or any chance we have of restoring our democracy will be lost forever. And all too many of us will never realize it's gone because it WON'T be televised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. all we need to do right now is point to myanmar, and its blockage of the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good point...
Not to mention China's actions in that regard as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not informed I guess.
I have no idea who has won any American Idol contest. Nor Survivor or a Big Brother show. I do think I remember reading that Jerry Springer was on Dancing With The Stars, but that "Big Pussy", whatever his real name was couldn't hack it.

I guess I'll never know nuthin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC