U.S. Detention Centers Part of Long-Term DHS Plan: "ENDGAME" Part I

[FourScore]

U.S. Detention Centers are Part of Long-Term DHS Plan: "ENDGAME," Part I
by Residentcynic
Sun Sep 30, 2007 at 04:41:55 AM PDT

I recently spent some time on the web researching the Bush Doctrine and neocon (Straussian)-based policy. What I didn’t expect to find was an operational government program which targets immigrants and "potential terrorists" on a grand scale. Never missing an opportunity for Orwellian titles, the Department of Homeland Security has named this little gem "ENDGAME."

Its goal is "the removal of all removable aliens, (including illegal economic migrants, aliens who have committed criminal acts, asylum-seekers required to be retained by law) or potential terrorists." (Executive summary of document)

Can't "potential terrorist" mean, well, anybody?

ENDGAME is the policy executed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its sub-agencies, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Office of Detention and Removal (DRO), that is part of a sweeping 10-year plan (2002-2012) to: 1) apprehend, 2) incarcerate (detain), 3) "process"—(investigate and question), and 4) remove all removable aliens or potential terrorists. The order of apprehension to removal is literal, as the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under DHS shifted the traditionally two-pronged approach of 1)investigation, 2)detention-removal to a one-pronged approach in 2000: detention-first and "process" the person while incarcerated. (p. 2-7 of ENDGAME document)

This is especially troubling, as the detention-removal prong was originally set up for aliens who had committed crimes. According to ICE, the investigation prong was discarded in 2000 because incarcerating first "reduce(s) potential demand for detention space, save(s) money,"increase(s) public safety, reduce(s) the potential for future crimes, and enhance(s) the welfare of our society." (2-7)

In 2000, 2004, and most recently on January 22, 2006, DHS awarded Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown, and Root (KBR) a contingency contract from DHS. The 2006 contract gave KBR $385 million "to establish temporary detention and processing capabilities to expand existing ICE Detention and Removal Operations Program facilities in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S.,or to support the rapid development of new programs."

Two weeks later, on Feb. 6, 2006, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, "announced that the Fiscal Year 2007 federal budget would allocate over $400 million to add 6,700 additional detention beds. This $400 million allocation is more than a four-fold increase over the FY 2006 budget, which provided only $90 million for the same purpose." The contract accomodates "up to 20,000 refugees from environmental and political disasters. A future expansion in 2008 calls for another 20,000 beds..."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/30/74155/1739

[FourScore]

1. How can this be dropping like a stone? n/t

[HCE SuiGeneris]

2. I have known of this for years.

My thinking is that those who care already know, and those that don't want to know, don't care. The ramifications are too much to consider for most.

[Faux pas]

3. I've known about this for awhile also. It's illogical, to say the least,

taxpayers paying to house and feed people who should be sent back where they came from (I'm talking criminal element here). Cheaper to pay the countries of origin to keep them incarcerated there. One thing I didn't know what that it costs almost $60,000 to 'build' a detention bed. Pitiful.

[FourScore]

4. Hmm...I think you missed the point. n/t

[Downtown Hound]

5. Yes, potential terrorist can mean anybody. n/t