I posted earlier questioning why the "condition of anonymity" for the recent claim by the ptb of Iran Supplying Weapons to Iraq Militias:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=190030&mesg_id=190030On that thread, I noted a recent presentation by Alireza Jafarzadeh, President, Strategic Policy Consulting, Inc. from just last month. Check it out -- according to this man, "The new information received from sources in Iran further confirms Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corp and its notorious Qods Force as the biggest threat and most challenging obstacle in Iraq."
http://www.spcwashington.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=250&Itemid=26I'm still curious if this is where Bush & Co. are getting their info -- from the MEK? I know Perle supported the MEK and participated in an effort to get the MEK off the US Terrorist list some time ago. Here are some old threads on MEK, and there were more a while back with Hersh's article that mentioned US support of MEK factions in Iraq -- check out some of robertpaulsen's posts about Feith and MEK on the 2nd link, around post #31:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=577982#578273 Hey Emit, here's that ABC link where Feith kisses up to MEK.
Published on Friday, May 30, 2003 by the ABC News
Pentagon Eyes Massive Covert Attack on Iran
WASHINGTON - The Pentagon is advocating a massive covert action program to overthrow Iran's ruling ayatollahs as the only way to stop the country's nuclear weapons ambitions, senior State Department and Pentagon officials told ABCNEWS.
The proposal, which would include covert sponsorship of a group currently deemed terrorist by the U.S. government, is not new, and has not won favor with enough top officials to be acted upon.
snip
The State Department argument was that MEK is on the terrorist list and any failure to disarm it would be an act of hypocrisy, which was the same line taken by the Iranians in confidential meetings that have been ongoing in Geneva, until the United States recently cut them off.
The office of Doug Feith, undersecretary for policy at the Department of Defense, argued that the MEK has not targeted Americans since the 1970s, which is true, and was only put on the terrorist list by the Clinton administration as a gesture to improve relations with Iran.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0530-03.htm More related info:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=923696&mesg_id=923696 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2570340&mesg_id=2570340 This MEK group says it Advises Congress, various Executive Branch agencies, etc.:
Strategic Policy Consulting, Inc. (SPC)
Strategic Policy Consulting, Inc. (SPC) is an independent firm, whose purpose is to provide expert advice and analysis on geopolitical developments in the Middle East. SPC serves as a valuable consultant in researching, developing and deploying solutions to the problematics of terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, and Islamic Fundamentalism, particularly with respect to these issues in Iran and Iraq.
SPC specialties include:
• Advising Congress, various Executive Branch agencies, and non-governmental organizations;
• Offering speakers for seminars, conferences, briefings, Congressional hearings, and university lectures;
• Providing incisive commentary to the media;
• Anticipating, assessing, and helping to disrupt threats to world peace;
• Informing a wide range of clients from senior policymakers to all-source analysts about the strengths and weaknesses of policies addressing key issues;
• Researching the evolution of sensitive topics of concern.
SPC experts will give counsel on international policy matters, conflict resolution, and regional & international crisis management.
Our consultants will provide comparative analyses of the various strategies proposed as solutions to the tough challenges of the Middle East, especially as they arise in Iran and Iraq.
We have experience, knowledge, unmediated information and a proven record in areas crucial to global security, peace and human rights.
SPC has effectively combined insight and knowledge of global issues to meet ever-changing international and regional challenges.
http://spcwashington.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=26&Itemid=39 It was the Iran Policy Committee (IPC) who held this conference:
The IPC is supported by the neocon all-stars that we’ve come to know and love such as Doug Feith, Frank Gaffney, Mike Ledeen, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Don Rumsfeld, Condi Rice, et al. But these first benchers are running out of political muscle as their war in Iraq continues to drain the resources of the American people on all political, economic and military fronts. What’s worse, perhaps, is their “with us or against us” mentality that has caused new political and economic alliances to form (example: South America-China-Iran) and that has accelerated both conventional and nuclear arms races. Having failed on so many fronts, they recognize that to get the US into Iran, some new faces are needed and that’s where the IPC back benchers are critical to the forthcoming anti-Iranian/Persian propaganda operations.
The IPC is linked through its purpose and people to the Coalition for a Democratic Iran and the MEK, the Washington PAC, JINSA, AIPAC, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, the DOD, the Center for Security Policy, and all the major US intelligence agencies. IPC members are primarily defense & security contractors/consultants and would benefit financially from a war with Iran.
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/May05/Stanton0519.htm Launched in 2005, IPC's main modus operandi is to hold a press conference, typically at the National Press Club, at which it releases the findings of its latest “white paper.” On January 11, 2007, a day after President George W. Bush announced his “surge” strategy for Iraq, IPC held a press conference at the National Press Club to announce the release of its latest paper, “How to Make the Surge Work: A Complementary Political-Military Plan for Iraq.” Arguing that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al Maliki would be unlikely to meet important political milestones in quelling the violence in that country because of Tehran's supposed meddling, the IPC paper maintains that the Bush administration should find a role for “the Iranian opposition in Iraq to build a national compact among the Iraqi factions.” For the IPC, the “Iranian opposition in Iraq” is represented by the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), a group that has been identified by the U.S. State Department as a terrorist group.
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/3280 On Jafarzadeh, he was the Washington spokesman for the National Council of Resistance, a front organization for the MEK/MKO:
The MKO operates in Washington out of a small office in the National Press Building under the name the National Council of Resistance of Iran. According to the State Department, the National Council of Resistance is a "front" for the MKO; in 1999, the National Council itself was placed on the State Department terrorist list. But National Council officials adamantly deny their group has earned the terror label and have aggressively portrayed itself to Washington lawmakers as a "democratic" alternative to a repressive Iranian regime that itself is one of the world's leading sponsors of terrorism. "You're talking about a really popular movement," says Alireza Jafarzadeh, the National Council's chief Washington spokesman, who insists that the MKO "targets only military targets."
http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:2ct7hA-JtlAJ:www.truthout.org/docs_02/09.30B.nswk.bagdad.htm+National+Council+of+Resistance+of+Iran+Alireza+Jafarzadeh&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=18&gl=usPrior to becoming a contributor for FOX News Channel, and until August 2003, Jafarzadeh acted for a dozen years as the chief congressional liaison and media spokesperson for the US representative office of Iran’s parliament in exile, the National Council of Resistance of Iran. Jafarzadeh earned his Bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor, and his Master’s degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Texas, in Austin.
http://www.spcwashington.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=32&Itemid=49Edited: clarity, I think