Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's What China and the USSR Supplied to North Vietnam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 10:03 AM
Original message
Here's What China and the USSR Supplied to North Vietnam
Sources of Weapons
Although most of their weapons, uniforms, and equipment were provided by the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China, the North Vietnamese also carried arms captured from the French and even the Japanese in the earlier Indochinese wars. North Vietnamese Army (N.V.A.) troops more often used standard-issue gear; their Viet Cong counterparts dressed as the peasants in whose villages they sought harbor, and frequently used improvised weapons.

MiG-21
MiG-21 sitting on runway The Soviet MiG-21 served as the primary high-altitude fighter in the North Vietnamese arsenal. Capable of flying more than twice the speed of sound and armed with a 30mm cannon and air-to-air missiles, the MiG-21 disrupted American bombing raids, shooting down bombers and engaging in furious and often victorious dogfights with American fighter planes. The highly-maneuverable MiG was also easy to maintain and could operate from unimproved airfields. The MiG-17, an earlier model in the MiG fighter series, also saw frequent service as a fighter/interceptor in North Vietnam



Fricking JET FIGHTERS, okay?

So, is the fact that the republicans didn't threaten to blow up China and the USSR for supplying war materiel that killed American soldiers an indication that this is not a valid causus belli, or is it because the U.S. only picks fights with smaller weaker countries that it thinks it can beat? (thinks, being the operative word)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. We still hadn't fulled processed what had happened in Korea, so we didn't see that
we had actually accomplished something there and didn't use the lessons learned in Korea in Vietnam. We were basically afraid of drawing China and the USSR into the fight with their nuclear weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. In other words
We were basically afraid of drawing China and the USSR into the fight with their nuclear weapons.

We only pick on weaker countries we think we can easily beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Almost. We pick on weaker countries that don't have nuclear weapons or nuclear weapon carrying
friends. This is one of the reasons that so many countries are racing to build nuclear weapon potential. They saw what happened to Iraq and they see what happens to a country like North Korea. They aren't fools and they see the difference between how we treat nations that can defend themselves with nuclear weapons and those that can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. We also don't pick fights with Bush family business associates
like the Saudi's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah. Lots of strange silence on that one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I saw some articles the other day about Saudi funding and support for the Sunni's
being a bigger factor in Iraq than the Iranian support of the Shias. Wish I'd saved the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Are they gonna do that for their boy Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. An old friend of mine that was in country in the very early days of the war
was telling me how some of the Viet Cong were using bolt action and flint lock guns.

Goes to show that we never had the "hearts and minds" of the people if they were using grandpas hand me down rifles to fight us.

Just my two cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. they had nukes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC