|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 09:17 AM Original message |
Edwards Proposes "Brownie's Law"ensuring that senior political appointees actually are qualified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
1. "Brownie's Law" PERFECT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmike27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
2. Hell of a good idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
3. What a wonderful name. I hope the law goes into effect and that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YankeyMCC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
4. It's just a little bit insane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
5. Excellent! And his comment that if you give Lobbyists Seat at Table...they'll eat all the food! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
6. Good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
7. Would it apply to Presidential Candidates? Only the "qualified" need run? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cabcere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
8. Haha...awesome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
9. We already have law for that- the law that requires they be confirmed by the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
10. Sadly, it's a good idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
11. I'm likin' this guy more and more everyday. "Brownie's Law" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-28-07 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
12. I simply love it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC