Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PREPACKAGED NEWS: New GAO report: Bush administration spent $1.6 billion on good press

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:12 PM
Original message
PREPACKAGED NEWS: New GAO report: Bush administration spent $1.6 billion on good press
Edited on Tue Aug-14-07 10:21 PM by DeepModem Mom
WP: UPDATE: PREPACKAGED NEWS
Tuesday, February 14, 2006; Page A13


Armstrong Williams was paid to promote No Child Left Behind. (AP)

How much is good press worth? To the Bush administration, about $1.6 billion.

That's how much seven federal departments spent from 2003 through the second quarter of 2005 on 343 contracts with public relations firms, advertising agencies, media organizations and individuals, according to a new Government Accountability Office report.

The 154-page report provides the most comprehensive look to date at the scope of federal spending in an area that generated substantial controversy last year. Congressional Democrats asked the GAO to look into federal public relations contracts last spring at the height of the furor over government-sponsored prepackaged news and journalism-for-sale.

Armstrong Williams, the conservative commentator, had been unmasked as a paid administration promoter who received $186,000 from the Education Department to speak favorably about President Bush's No Child Left Behind law in broadcast appearances....

***

The new report reveals that federal public relations spending goes far beyond "video news releases." The contracts covered the waterfront, from a $6.3 million agreement to help the Department of Homeland Security educate Americans about how to respond to terrorist attacks; to a $647,350 contract to assist the Transportation Security Administration in producing video news releases and media tours on the subject of airport security procedures; to a $6,600 contract to train managers at the Bureau of Reclamation in dealing with the media.

"Careful oversight of this spending is essential given the track record of the Bush administration, which has used taxpayer dollars to fund covert propaganda within the United States," Rep. Henry A. Waxman (Calif.), ranking Democrat of the House Government Reform Committee, said in a statement yesterday.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/13/AR2006021301897.html?nav=hcmodule
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thieves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. There are American Children going hungry tonight !
bush is an asshole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. And despite all that money, America still thinks Bush, his administration,
and its policies are FAILURES.

The man isn't capable of anything more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Hey, he never did know how to handle money responsibly.
Just look at how "well" he did as a businessman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
24. Yeah, that was really effective advertising, wasn't it?
Given that he's 30% in the polls, over 70% want out of Iraq and most think the economy is headed for the crapper, he should ask for his money back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. So, they spent $1.6 billion on PR? So what?
Was there something about actual reporters being paid that I missed?

Also, your title is misleading. The article only claims $1.6 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. THANKS FOR ALERTING ME TO A REALLY BAD TYPO!
I've edited now, and thanks again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. "Bush administration ... covert propaganda within the United States," Rep. Henry A. Waxman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. so what? it's illegal, that's what.
Video news releases Fleishman-Hillard (and its subcontractors Gourvitz Communications and Harbour Media) produced for ONDCP were found to be in violation of the ban on covert government propaganda.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Video_news_r...

News propaganda is illegal because we are supposed to make decisions based upon facts...because we are supposed to have a representative govt.


http://mediacitizen.blogspot.com/2006/02/fleecing-and-f...

The GAO report carefully itemizes this administration’s preference for pre-packaged reporting at the expense of real news and information – in a scheme to make U.S. taxpayers pay for their own deception.

The report found that White House public relations spending goes well beyond the practices of any prior administration. The contracts included $2.5 million to present the Army's strategy in the global war on terrorism; $86 million to explain the new Medicare prescription drug benefit in a bilingual ad campaign; and a $6.3 million agreement to help the Department of Homeland Security educate Americans about how to respond to terrorist attacks.

Fixing the Facts

This is not the first we’ve heard about this. Last September, GAO auditors scolded the White House for squandering American tax dollars to hire fake news reporters and unleash a pre-packaged news blitz in advance of the 2004 elections. That GAO report found the White House violated the law by hiring pundit Armstrong Williams to appear before the cameras and tout Bush’s education initiative, the No Child Left Behind Act, while interviewing administration officials on the air.


because otherwise, the govt can lie about reasons to go to war... which is why people are so mad at Pelosi now for saying impeachment is off the table...what does someone have to do in govt. to be held accountable? Oh wait I know. get a blow job.


----
http://www.freepress.net/propaganda/=pentagon

According to Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber, in the run-up to the War in Iraq the Pentagon handed “global strategic communications consultancy” the Rendon Group a multi-million-dollar contract to sell Americans on a preemptive war in Iraq. Both Rendon and the Pentagon have kept steadfastly quiet on exactly what this involved. Seymour Hersh has since reported that Rendon had been hired by the Pentagon’s now-defunct Office of Strategic Influence, to plant news stories – including false ones – in the media. We have yet to uncover which American “journalists” worked with the OSI while it existed, and how much they were paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. "Get a blow job" is not sufficient.
Be a Democrat & get a blow job is sufficient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. it's billion not million n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. The article says 1.6 BILLION,
not 1.6 MILLION.

Your correction needs correction.

(I dunno about you but I hate it when that happens.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
36. Actually yes there was.
Um:- "Armstrong Williams, the conservative commentator, had been unmasked as a paid administration promoter who received $186,000 from the Education Department to speak favorably about President Bush's No Child Left Behind law in broadcast appearances...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's insane
Seriously insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Think of how much
real honest to goodness good news that 1.6 billion could have produced had it been invested in well managed programs instead of lies designed to make people THINK they are hearing good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R.
Lousy shitburgers. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. $1.6 billion to mindf**k us into thinking things aren't as bollocksed up.....
as we know they really are. Will this nightmare ever end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. And the Corporate Media gratefully reciprocates, too.
The best media money can buy ... by the best government money can buy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. What is truly frightening is that you are right.
This is exactly the quality of human being you get when you set out to purchase that which should never be for sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. US LIES: Journalist Quit Iraqi Media Project = $96M Propaganda Project
Taxpayer $millions$ buying LIES = Pentagon aimed to control Iraqi media during war

Before you believe ANYTHING AT ALL in the way of Iraq news, read "Assault on Reason" and these:
INSTALLING DEMOCRACY NOW! USG-seized IRAQ media run by defense contractor.

======================
Wednesday, January 14th, 2004
U.S. Journalist Quits Pentagon Iraqi Media Project Calling it U.S. Propaganda
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/14/155

Listen LINK

We talk to a longtime TV producer about the massive problems he saw in the new U.S.-funded Iraqi Media Network, which he said became an "irrelevant mouthpiece for Coalition Provisional Authority propaganda, managed news and mediocre programs." The U.S. has awarded a $96 million contract to a U.S. producer of communications equipment, Harris Corp., to create a U.S.-funded national media network in Iraq.

According to the head of Harris Corp, the Iraqi Media Network will have 30 TV and radio transmitters, three broadcast studios, and 12 bureaus around Iraq.

After U.S.-led troops ousted Saddam Hussein's regime in April, the state-run broadcasters were seized. Since then, they have been run by a U.S. defense contractor, Science Applications International Corporation. .........

TRANSCRIPT w/ Amy Goodman ........ longtime TV producer, Don North, about the problems he saw ...

==========================
Your tax $$$ purchased media outlets in Iraq, and bought reporters too - http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x980363#980750
We have to ask,
"To what extent is this happening today and everywhere?"
"To what extent is this happening with other issues too?"

I have been told by major news announcers, "We just read it."
And, worse still, they do not even know who writes it for them!

We have to ask,
"To what extent is news just propaganda and BUSH LIES?"

==========================
Pentagon pays Iraqi papers to print its 'good news' stories
Jamie Wilson in Washington
Thursday December 1, 2005 - The Guardianhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1654661,00.html

Faced with suicide bombings, claims of Iraqi death squads, and kidnappings, the Pentagon has come up with an innovative solution to solving the problems in Iraq: buying good news. Using defence contractors or intermediaries posing as freelance reporters, the military has been paying Iraqi newspapers to publish stories written by a military propaganda unit lauding the US mission.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the articles are translated into Arabic and placed in Baghdad newspapers where they are often presented as unbiased accounts by independent journalists. Records obtained by the newspaper indicate the US has paid to publish dozens of articles since the operation began this year, with headlines such as "Iraqis insist on living despite terrorism" and "more money goes to Iraq's development".

One military official told the LA Times the military has also bought an Iraqi newspaper and taken control of a radio station, ...........

==========================
Pentagon OK's Propaganda for Iraq (and Possibly Elsewhere) - http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x980363#981355
Source: Los Angeles Times, March 4, 2006 - http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-inf
http://www.prwatch.org/node/4517

Declaring it "within our authorities and responsibilities," the top U.S. general in Iraq, George Casey, announced that the Lincoln Group program that covertly places stories written by U.S. troops in Iraqi newspapers will continue. Navy Admiral Scott Van Buskirk is also reviewing the Iraq propaganda program. His review was previously described as finished but not public .....

===========================
The Sword Employs the Pen = "the military's practice of paying journalists"

Center for Media and Democracy » Spin of the Day » Feb 07, 2005

The Sword Employs the Pen - http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x980363#981426
http://www.prwatch.org/node/3260

The Pentagon is investigating "the military's practice of paying journalists to write articles and commentary ... and also looking more broadly at Pentagon activities that might involve inappropriate payments to journalists," writes Associated Press. CNN reported on Pentagon involvement with two news websites, Southeast European Times (focused on the Balkans) and Magharebia (focused on North Africa). Some 50 journalists were paid by the Pentagon through a private contractor, Anteon Corporation, ..........

==============================
Pentagon Paid Reporters for Stories Overseas
February 06, 2005 9:00 AM ET
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000789872

WASHINGTON (AP) The Pentagon’s chief investigator is looking into the military’s practice of paying journalists to write articles and commentary for a Web site aimed at influencing public opinion in the Balkans, officials said Friday.

At the request of Larry Di Rita, chief spokesman for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, the Pentagon’s inspector general, Joseph Schmitz, is reviewing that case and also looking more broadly at Pentagon activities that might involve inappropriate payments to journalists. ...............

==============================
Covert propaganda >> Instances of covert propaganda - http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Covert_propaganda

MORE: From: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x980430
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Thanks for this info, L. Coyote! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. "the Bush administration, which has used taxpayer dollars to fund covert propaganda"
Now we're getting the bill. $1.6 billion!!??!!

What a thief, liar and cheat!!!!

Impeach that bastard!! :grr:

Great find on the article, DeepModem Mom!!

:kick: & Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. 6.3 million to tell us how to duct tape our windows? Six.three million.
Edited on Tue Aug-14-07 10:32 PM by higher class
Maybe six for the duct tape lessons and .3 to tell us about the colors whether we were color blind or not.

I'm sure shirt-off would want to outspend his predecessors.

How can you have any respect for the stupidly, utterly stupidly, spent money?
Who the hell gave that order?

And where is the list of every so-called journalist who got paid?

And how many children died for lack of repsonse during that time.

We've been crapped on, people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Freedom isn't free, ya know.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. Shouldn't this all be listed under Operation Mockingbird ?
A CIA program that was supposed to have ended but, as you can see, never really did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. Using our tax dollars to do that. That's like whipping a dog
with its own leash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. Beyond FoxNoise, buying good press is the only way the Bushies can get it
Edited on Tue Aug-14-07 10:52 PM by Jack Rabbit
!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
23. kick--....and HOW much funding is given to PBS and NPR? and
these jackholes complain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. they complain because of the lack of control
and remember what they did to PBS and NPR. What was the name of that real shit head who gambled on NPR time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alpharetta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
26. That would be paid bloggers too, I bet
trolls and funded rightwing websites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. No stone unturned.
I am sure that a number of them were paid to be trolls too. Either that or my tinfoil hat is on a bit too tight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. It's called "FRAUD"!!! When are they going to be charged with it and MISAPPROPRIATION?
When?

By whom?

When?

They committed multiple OBSCENE CRIMES AGAINST THIS NATION!!!!!!

Who is going to hold them to the law? When?

Their actions have led to hundreds of millions of victims.

Who will seek justice for those victimized by these fuckers?

WHEN will those who CAN prosecute on behalf of the victims seek justice?

WHAT court will see that justice is served?

I'm just ASKING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
30. How much would a 3rd world sweat shop of forum worms cost?
:rofl: Imagine a factory of computers and $3 a day workers, outsourcing influencing discussion forums!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The M Double Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 10:16 PM
Original message
K
& R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
32. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.0
==================



This week is our third quarter 2007 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend on donations
from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JFN1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
34. Well, now we know for certain
why the MSM has been laying down for Bush - it pays very, very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
35. Gold Plated Lies in Bulk Quantities don't come cheap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
37. it's like your neighbor borrowing your car to run you over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC