Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Citizen Murdoch: NY Times "outrageously biased"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:26 PM
Original message
Citizen Murdoch: NY Times "outrageously biased"
Edited on Thu Feb-08-07 01:32 PM by edbermac
From Mr Fair And Balanced himself.


NEW YORK Speaking at the 2007 Media Summit in New York today, News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch said that he doesn't think his bid, with the Chandler family, is likely to succeed in winning the auction for the Tribune company, and that his rumored interest in acquiring Dow Jones is "cooling."

Murdoch, whose company, of course, has a wide range of international holdings in newspapers, acknowledged that the business was "vulnerable," and said that newspaper companies needed to look at themselves more as information providers in the future.

"We've just got to be neutral about what platform we sell them on and view them on," he said.

On political expression in newspapers, Murdoch said he did think they were an appropriate forum, calling it "a matter of freedom of speech in editorials." He said the New York Times was "outrageously biased," and defended the New York Post's news pages. He admitted that he often disagrees with things that appear on the Post's editorial pages, but that for the most part his views were "broadly in alignment" with the newspaper's.

Murdoch also discussed the launch of a Fox "business" channel later this year, which he described as more "friendly" to business than CNBC.

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003543448

Biased towards the truth, Mr Murdoch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Talk about Freudian projection . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Onlyon social issues
Otherwise, its a PNACing whore.


See: Judy Miller, et al
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. "more friendly to business than CNBC"
:wtf: How much more friendly can you get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Maybe it's another type of friendly.
Edited on Thu Feb-08-07 01:49 PM by Marr
CNBC (and the rest of the corporate media) is "friendly" to business the way frat brothers are friendly to each other. They have the same interests and the same friends.

Maybe Fox Business will be "friendly" to business in the way that prostitutes are friendly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Pot. Kettle. Black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's right. It is.
Just not in the way he likes to imply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. isn''t this the same man who boasted at Davos that faux snooze did, in fact, have extremely
biased coverage in the events leading to the iraq invasion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Mirror, mirror...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Right, the NYT and the Post were totally at odds on that whole WMD thing
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC