Cheney Impeachment: And then there were 15

[Greeby]

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HE00333:@@@N

Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy - 5/1/2007
Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. - 5/1/2007
Rep Wynn, Albert Russell - 5/10/2007
Rep Clarke, Yvette D. - 6/6/2007
Rep Lee, Barbara - 6/7/2007
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. - 6/7/2007
Rep Waters, Maxine - 6/12/2007
Rep Johnson, Henry C. "Hank," Jr. - 6/28/2007
Rep Ellison, Keith - 6/28/2007
Rep McDermott, Jim - 7/10/2007
Rep Moran, James P. - 7/10/2007
Rep Farr, Sam - 7/12/2007
Rep Filner, Bob - 7/12/2007
Rep Brady, Robert A. - 7/24/2007

:applause:

[Richard Steele]

1. Drip, drip, drip....

[babylonsister]

2. "It's like pulling teeth" - now I know what that means. nt

[5X]

3. I will k and r that. n/t

[porphyrian]

4. So, two more and Conyers will do it?

Or is that off now?

[Hissyspit]

5. Here is transcript and video of what Conyers said in San Diego:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x43340

[KharmaTrain]

10. When The Polls Start Climbing Over 60%

Last poll, over 50% favored cheney's impeachment...the chimpster isn't that far behind...but it's still not enough to move some off center on this topic. Now, if new polls start showing 60% or more in favor of a cheney impeachment, I am sure you're gonna see more sponsors and interest in getting the popular support to start hearings and write articles of impeachment on crashcart. The roadblock remains having a direct crime that can be hung on "shooter"...since the evidence is hidden behind "Executive privilidge". Let's get inherent contempt charges on members of this regime and shatter this stonewall...on the other side are cheney and bush's criminal indictments and the popular and political support to ensure a successful impeachment and conviction.

[jtrockville]

6. Show him some love: LINK

http://www.bobbrady.us/pages/contribute.lasso

[jtrockville]

7. Arrrrgh! The "contribute" button is broken :(

[sicksicksick_N_tired]

8. Another kNr. eom

[Fiendish Thingy]

9. Where is Brady from ? NT

[Toots]

11. Not one single Co-Sponsor to the Clinton Impeachment

Fifteen so far and counting for getting rid of Cheney. Why would Conyers say he needs seventeen before proceding?

[Solly Mack]

12. Is it out of sub-committee yet?

[Greeby]

13. You'll have to get on Nadler's case for that nt

http://judiciary.house.gov/committeestructure.aspx?committee=7

[Solly Mack]

14. I'm aware of who is on the sub-committee

just asking a question, and I'm assuming from your response, the answer is no

[The Stranger]

15. Reason Number 5,429,209 to impeach.

Maybe if Nancy would put Impeachment back on the table, the drip-drip-drip would become a deluge.

[lonestarnot]

16. still waiting and watching.

:applause:

[realbluesky]

17. Can anybody tell me why the dems are so reluctant to do their duty?

I have read a lot about impeachment and the dems reluctance to pursue this action, but I have yet to read anything that makes any sense as to why they are reluctant to do so. I am willing to listen to any reasonable argument. But in my way of thinking, serious crimes have been committed. It is the duty of the House of Representatives to bring impeachment charges against the criminals. If they don't do it, they are not doing their duty.

America needs leaders not politicians who wait for the polls to swing before they do their jobs.

[cynatnite]

18. Out of 233 dems... n/t

[Mandate My Ass]

19. Philly in the hizz-ouse

WTG, Bob Brady. :applause: