Is this you tube debate setup the stupidest thing you've ever seen?

[RB TexLa]

Poll question: Is this you tube debate setup the stupidest thing you've ever seen?

[DeposeTheBoyKing]

1. The stupidest thing I've ever seen is the freaking do-nothing Congress

[rurallib]

3. I hope you understand that is caused by republiklans

[DeposeTheBoyKing]

10. I'm referring to impeachment (or lack thereof)

I'm not blaming the Democrats for failure to get us out of Iraq (YET).

[Raine]

2. If gives the "average" person a chance

to ask questions instead of the media with questions that are same old same old. :shrug:

[NYC Liberal]

4. I think the problem is not the idea or the format

The problem is that you have the corporate media filtering questions. They ought to have done it by VOTES.

[Jack Bone]

5. I agree...why did they have the videos voted on??

:shrug:

[matcom]

6. thought it was wonderful

and yes, they filtered the questions but the questions were genuine and they couldn't filter the questioners or their thoughts. i'm impressed.

sorry you can't be satisfied with anything in this world.

[trumad]

7. He's getting slaughtered in his own poll.

[matcom]

9. texas

[LWolf]

8. No. It's not great.

"Great" is only reached when every candidate is given equal time on every question.

Taking questions from the general public is the first step to "great," though. Most questions were good.

[ComerPerro]

11. Nice ideas, but the primaries are mostly meaningless

No point in backing a candidate until 2008. Its not like primary votes really mean shit. I've never even been able to vote in one.

[JeffR]

12. For a first-time experiment, it was pretty good

but there were too many questions, necessitating the usual abbreviated soundbite answers. And there was way too big an imbalance in the amount of time different candidates got to speak at all.