Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Lieberman (I) Speaking Against Non-binding Resolution C-SPAN Now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:54 PM
Original message
Joe Lieberman (I) Speaking Against Non-binding Resolution C-SPAN Now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, time to channel surf.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. You missed Joe saying he will filibuster
and then, in that whiny voice of his, he says that the troops will be undermined by this resolution. God, I cannot stand that man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. I turned back in time to see his back and forth....
with Senator Warner about which supports the troops.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Joe's whinning about congress "rebuking" the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is he singing "It's In His Kiss (The Shoop-Shoop Song)"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. That "marriage" was sold to folks in Joe's state . Connecticutt embraced Bush as well.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. This guy is such a rat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. "This is what happens is when you wage war by committee" Joe believes the "Decider" should
call all of the shots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's either "war by committee" or war by dictator.
I guess we know what he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. War by commitee or war by idiot n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
41. And he knows it.
He gets off on it, too, I swear... :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. "We shouldn't take such a vote on the eve of a decisive battle"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. WHAT decisive battle? What is the WH telling Joementum
that the rest of us may not know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. It's the language. Remember when Rep. McDermott reported that Saddam had no WMD
"on the eve of war"? Joe's going all dramatic on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Decisive battle?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
40. Joe's attempting to paint the resolution as a detriment to "our troops". He's using
dramatic language to do so. Anything goes for that shameless clown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'll be thrilled....
when the day arrives that nobody gives a damn what Loserman says or does. He will be 100% irrelevant to his former party.

Just another DEM Senator or two....then bye, bye Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. "We can't have it both ways"
Unless, of course, we want to be both a Democrat and a republicon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. He just said "If you think the right thing to do is to pull the troops
out, then vote against funding this war." In all fairness, I can't disagree with that statement!

Say it with your vote folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. I thought you were for bringing the troops home LIEberman?
Edited on Mon Feb-05-07 05:08 PM by Nutmegger
Remember all those ads you ran? Remember? "I want to bring them home as much as the next person" - that ring a bell?

What a lying pig. Kick him to the curb in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. "on the eve of a decisive battle"
is he talking about baghdad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Joe's being over-dramatic and just talking out of his ass. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. if there actually IS a "decisive battle"...
... I feel confident that the troops will strictly adhere to the Geneva Conventions.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm listening
He's using the "aiding and abetting" the enemy line.

what a turd.

I wonder how many Connecticut voters are rethinking their votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaudacity Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Who am I going to take off the "dead to me" list to make room for Lieberman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. LOL
That really made me laugh, as did your username. Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
42. LIEberman has been "dead to me" for some time.
And my list still has lots of room!! :)

Seriously, what a total a-hole. I didn't think I COULD have less respect for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. he's using republican time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. Joe IS a Republican. Joe's message to Connecticutt: "Thanks for the votes, suckers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hard to believe this POS is still in the Senate. He couldn't even
win the Dem primary and he gets re-elected in a year when repukes are being tossed out on their asses left and right - witness Allen, Santorum, Burns, hell even Chaffee went down. Lieberman is just repulsive. The Dems who joined with the repukes in rewarding this asshole with another 6 year term ought to be ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Lieberman is a shameless shill for the White House. Congratulations Connecticutt.
:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. Senator Warner and Joe having a mini debate with each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. He was using time to speak on McConnels time (a Republican!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Joe is against the resolution. He's with McConnell and John Cornyn.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. Warner to Lieberman...
"my resolution also expresses support for our troops...and neither is less patriotic than the other"

Ouch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSchewe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. I heard that and the rest of the exchange. It was priceless.
You had to love the stupid look on Lieberman's face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Jon Stewart or Keith Olbermann should run that piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Warner was pissed...
LIEberman was up to his old tricks with the snide accusations that opposing our dictator and his endless war was somehow not 'supporting the troops'. Warner smacked him down good - god, what a humiliation to have this former Democrat kicked to the curb by a Republican.

LIEberman was also boasting about the McCain/LIEberman bill that, as Warner tersely pointed out, wasn't even FILED. What a loathesome tool LIEberman is, a worm without conscience. Hey Joe, when are YOUR kids going to Baghdad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. When Warner asked Joe for the document, Joe got all tongue tied. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. self-delete
Edited on Mon Feb-05-07 05:25 PM by brooklynite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaudacity Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
28. bush v. lieberman, who do you respect less?
1. A man you sometimes agree with who has no conviction or character.
2. A man who you never agree with that has too much conviction and character.

I report, you decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Joe did the bidding of the WH, denied it when he ran for re-election, and then
continued to kiss Bush's ass after deceiving the voters of Connecticutt.

:dunce::Thanks for the votes, suckers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
43. who the hell wants to watch that toad???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC