|
this is from Political Insider:
Style
At the risk of creating crosstalk, I just watched the speech and wanted to add a thought. I used to like Edwards a lot. I liked him for crafting creative policies and having a certain talent to connect. I no longer like him very much. He really hasn't worn well for me, and I think the speech is a good example of why. On paper, it might have moved me. On radio, it could have worked. But when I actually see his facial gestures and the coordinated squinting that felt choreographed for every anecdote, it felt far too maudlin--Bill Clinton squared--and I know this is the way he rubs many people.
I'm not saying this is Edwards' fault. I have no doubt he's a smart, committed and genuine person. He might make a good president. But I don't see how he can overcome this, especially when you factor in the one-term-former-senator thing.
The race is going to showcase some fascinating, contrasting styles. We've got Edwards, who you can feel Reaching to Inspire (or Daring to Give an Honest Answer that May be Unpopular) in every sentence; Obama, who does that plenty but strikes a more sober, I Know My Own Strength kind of tone; and Clinton, who understands perfectly well that she's not built to be inspirational, she's a pragmatist and a pol who simply needs to show that she can get things done. That's not to mention Biden, Richardson and all the rest.
|