Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM: GTMO Hearings Severely Flawed, Army Intelligence Officer Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 10:17 PM
Original message
TPM: GTMO Hearings Severely Flawed, Army Intelligence Officer Says
It's been a banner week for Guantanamo Bay. First the Bush administration nixes reports that it plans to close the facility. Then the Defense Department announces a new detainee is on his way there. If that wasn't enough, according to a declaration filed in D.C. Circuit Court by a U.S. Army Reserve intelligence officer, the hearings that determine whether a detainee is properly classified as an "enemy combatant" are riddled with flaws.

snip

In his declaration, obtained by TPMmuckraker, Abraham charges that the officers tasked with gathering information on a detainee -- known as a Recorder or a Case Writer -- typically have "little training or experience" in intelligence. The fact files they compile are most often "outdated, often 'generic,' (and) rarely specifically relating to the individual subjects of the CSRT," and frequently reliant on a Pentagon database that lacked information from across the intelligence community. "This limitation," Abraham writes, "was frequently not understood by individuals with access to or who relied upon the system as a source of information."

snip

When Abraham's team ultimately recommended that the detainee was improperly classified, the then-head of OARDEC, Rear Admiral James McGarrah, ordered the CSRT reopened, "to allow the Recorder to present further argument as to why the detainee should be classified as an enemy combatant." And what do you think happened to Abraham after that?

"I was not assigned to another CSRT panel."

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003512.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. and the nerve of this statement from his supervisor...
McGarrah, now retired, testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2005 that the process emphasizes "fairness to the detainee, as well as our clear desire not to detain persons any longer than necessary."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC