Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An idiot claims (lies) that lame duck sessions of Congress are illegal - Fox News does not challenge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
LuckyTheDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:34 PM
Original message
An idiot claims (lies) that lame duck sessions of Congress are illegal - Fox News does not challenge
 
Run time: 08:16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgJ7RymYbaY
 
Posted on YouTube: December 22, 2010
By YouTube Member: RepMicheleBachmann
Views on YouTube: 223
 
Posted on DU: December 22, 2010
By DU Member: LuckyTheDog
Views on DU: 1611
 
About 5 minutes into this, the moron Michele Bachmann asserts that the Constitution forbids lame-duck sessions of Congress. She said the same thing on the Hannity show today. This is, of course, complete nonsense. But because she said it, millions of Fox viewers will believe it -- and repeat it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. DO NOT use the term "NEWS" when referencing Fox Noise. It IS NOT a "news" outlet.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Gawd! Thats so spot on...
Fox spits out CRAP and it viewers don't even question it. To them its Gospel. Now they are promoting everything from Angelic visits to creating the impression that Democrats are dangerously
insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWinNJ Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Michele Bachmann reminds us
Who puts lame in lame duck.
Who puts partisan in bipartisan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Volaris Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. time index 8.15---
"Oversight will look backwards---"
all the way back to the Bush administration, Michelle?
Yeah didn't think so. Nice try though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
4.  That woman makes me ashamed to be from the same state as her.
Was she educated in this state? If so something has to be done about our schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smuglysmiling Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good to know...
the Clinton impeachment done by a lame-duck congress in 1998 was illegal...I'm sure she will lead the charge to prosecute those who violated the law....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. 'the tea party is not republican or democrat' - uh, yea Batsh*t Girl

Bachmann, on the 'intelligence committee'? is the irony not lost on everyone?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idrahaje Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. basically neo nazi.
go figure. X_X

what isn't republican or democrat is whether one wants illegal immigrants in the country or not. Some Republicans are pro some are anti. same as Democrats. That's not a party issue. But Michelle has such a massive ego that idiots in Minnesota want to vote for her and bitch when they can't because her district is so small my pinkie is bigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Can of Whoop-ass Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Whoops!
She's the most unninteresting, regressive Borg in the World. Her mother has a tattoo that says, "Barack!".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wouldn't Obama have to be in a second term for this to actually be a lame duck session?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VPStoltz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. No. Any session would be lame duck if any defeated Congresspersons came back to pass legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smuglysmiling Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. it refers to congress in this case...
they are considered in a lame duck session from election day to the first day of the new session in January every 2 years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bachmann should be weaving baskets
and getting electric-shock therapy. What a hosebag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Her husband is a counselor
so he can give her treatments right in their S&M room
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VPStoltz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. They are not illegal per se...
the 20th Amendment to the Constitution passed some time ago meant to terminate the practice. It didn't make the practice "illegal" it just moved the end of the session ahead to Jan. 1
The writers of the Amendment think anyone would travel back to Washington between Thanksgiving and January. They didn't envision air travel.


http://www.pressherald.com/news/nationworld/lame-ducks-fly-in-the-face-of-history_2010-12-18.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyTheDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Ummmm... not really true
The 20th Amendment made lame-duck sessions no longer mandatory. But in no way does it constrain Congress from holding sessions in December or any time after the general election and before the new Congress is seated.

Look at the amendment. The language just is not there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VPStoltz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Ummm... that's what I said.
I was just paraphrasing what was in the article.
I don't believe lame duck session were ever "mandatory."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyTheDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Yes, they were mandatory
Edited on Thu Dec-23-10 06:58 PM by LuckyTheDog
Prior to the 20th Amendment, Congress was required to meet in December. The new Congress was not seated until March.

Originally, under Article I, Section 4, Clause 2, the Congress was required to convene at least once each year in December. That requirement created a mandatory lame duck session following each federal election.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twentieth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. She is a Liar!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idrahaje Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. Oh dear , so it was illegal to Impeach a president during a lame duck session.
Why aren't those Republicans in jail then??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. She was put on the Intelligence Committee???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC