Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN: 'Some of the Most Shocking Legal Documents I've Ever Seen'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 02:52 AM
Original message
CNN: 'Some of the Most Shocking Legal Documents I've Ever Seen'
 
Run time: 10:39
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIN-ioLk8sI
 
Posted on YouTube: April 17, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: April 17, 2009
By DU Member: Hissyspit
Views on DU: 2951
 
CNN Anderson Cooper 360 - 16 April 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gergin Is Wrong - This Needs The Highest Exposure
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. The reality is. We all knew this--most Americans who were not
Edited on Fri Apr-17-09 04:33 AM by OHdem10
under a rock knew this. We knew and it has been reported ad nauseam
that we used waterboarding.

Moreover, many Americans have no problem with doing bad things
to Terrorists who wish us harm. You would be surprised if you
were able to talk to people and they knew it would be safe to
tell you the truth of how they feel.

Our Leaders,that is Congressmen and Senators especially' those on
Committees having to do with Intelligence and the War, KNEW
these techniques were being used. If something was to be done
they knew what was going on, they should have had the courage
of their convictions to speak out when it was happening. Just like
the Banking Issue, "we didn't know" is not exactly the truth.

If all this were suddenly being exposed, it might be different.

President Obama is being very wise--to move on.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bfealk Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is the same argument the Nazis used
The Nuremburg trials prosecuted the people that were "just taking orders" and it's offensive to hear Gergin use that argument.

They should all be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The other thing not prosecuting Bush and Cheney and the rest proves is that if the President does it it is not illegal.

This is a big black mark on the Obama administration and the American people if these people are not prosecuted and we will live to regret this as a country.

I am quickly losing faith in President Obama's judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. There is one big difference between now and Nuremberg.
And that is that we won a military victory in Germany.
Here we have only a political victory and that does not give Obama as much power as you think it does.
Try arresting half of the congress and thousands of military and CIA people that knew and were involved...not to mention the private contractors who were also involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. The next shoe to drop: torture does NOT (and did not) work
to gain useful intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. If you need a patsy to confess to a crime, it most certainly does work. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. These arguments don't hold.
They are specious at best and morally revolting at worst.

The Nuremberg tribunals did not accept the 'good soldier' argument. The tribunal stated that the soldier in the dock knew right from wrong, and knew when the orders they were following were repugnant.

Torture does not work. It works only to obtain false confessions, and that doesn't produce anything useful. The US has killed, mutilated, and produced lasting trauma in thousands of people. Those memos are proof that, as the Arabic saying goes, the fish rots from the head.

Moving on is fine. Ignoring this kind of criminality is not. Doing so allows the re-writing of history......and the forgetting of history when another Bush or Rumsfeld or Cheney manages to slither into power.

Enough. Either do it, or let the world court do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Very simple folks.
Fascists torture. Bush-Cheney=fascism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. witch hunt??
We're not looking for evidence of witchcraft..we want accountability. To make clear that what they did was immoral and illegal and will not be tolerated! Like Elvis said..a little less conversation, a little more action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. yippee!
Edited on Fri Apr-17-09 07:36 AM by 90-percent
Thanks for not looking into this, Barack!

ALL AMERICANS ARE TORTURERS NOW!

May God have mercy on all of us in the future, when we elect a President that isn't as nice as Nixon and Cheney and GW was!

Think life in the USA will be better when we have a psycho on the White House with the powers of a medieval monarch?

We are fucking over the unborn with the national debt, global warming, famine and the like. Why not make then deal with a sadistic and lawless President on top of all that!

Hey all you unborn people: FFFUUUCCCKKK YYYYOOOUUUU!!!!!

-90% jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. I object to the term "Witch Hunt"
Gergan is using this term to discredit any investigation as being analogous to McCarthyism. He also seeks to exonerate Bush and Cheney on the basis that they were thrust into a situation without precedence. I don't consider either of these excuses for inaction as being warranted.

An investigation should be conducted to expose those who are fully responsible for launching this evil exercise. If they are not brought up on charges, they should at least be publicly censored by the congress and their actions condemned. A public condemnation of their abuses would forever blacken their name and relegate them to the ranks of the most despicable in the history of mankind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
federationfilms Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. it's not simulated drowning...
...it's drowning. So just because they stop after a few seconds it's 'simulated'?!?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. simulated drowning
in the same sense that beheading can be simulated, I guess?

-90% jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. Great responses DU (rec'd). Toobin is excellent-but he did back off. Gergen is DC
By the way-the answer to the question posed at the break was 108 the editing of this kind of swallowed that up

Gergen is telling us what DC has decided but he didn't sound sure of it. DC can't put this to bed.

Toobin was right and the Bibby part was a public condemnation. We should ask "Did this work?" not only because we can handle the truth but also because it didn't and it doesn't other than to scare the locals (in a global climate everyone is a local).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. The third shoe to drop
Is that these 'suspects' were victims of round-ups and there was minimal if any incriminating evidence against them othe than that manufactured by our so-called intelligence agencies. Our intelligence community is a politicized bureaucracy and has been discredited by this as well as other major failures - just to name a few that we know about - failing to predict the fall of the Berlin Wall and the list goes on to 9-11.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. If we do not prosecute...
...then we cannot argue, going forward, that this nation "does not torture". Because all that means, really, is that the current administration does not torture. But a future administration is free to do so, should they deem that circumstances warrant it, and they will not be held accountable.

This will be a black mark on our country no matter what. The question at hand is, are we serious about the question of torture. If we do not prosecute those who have broken this absolute rule -- then we can never again say that we are a nation who "does not torture". Instead we will be a nation who "does not torture as much as some others ... most of the time ... unless we think we need to."

And of course it also means that our fighting men and women will be more at risk of the same kinds of tactics being used on them. We will never regain any moral high ground here unless and until there are prosecutions.

I am saddened that Obama has ruled out prosecuting the actual perpetrators of torture -- allowing them to take refuge behind "I was just following orders". If, in addition to that, Obama will not hold the higher-ups accountable -- at a minimum that would be Bush, Cheney, Gonzales, Rice, Rumsfeld, Yoo, Byebee -- then we are not serious in our policies against torture. And we will have irrevocably changed who we are as a people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. Mr. Gergen, please learn some history before you pretend to be
some kind of expert.

Remember the War of 1812? Do you remember that the British invaded the capitol, Washington, D.C. and burned the buildings?

In 1814 the United States faced complete defeat, because the British, having defeated Napoleon, began to transfer large numbers of ships and experienced troops to America. The British planned to attack the United States in three main areas: in New York along Lake Champlain and the Hudson River in order to sever New England from the union; at New Orleans to block the Mississippi; and in Chesapeake Bay as a diversionary maneuver. The British then hoped to obtain major territorial concessions in a peace treaty. The situation was particularly serious for the United States because the country was insolvent by the fall of 1814, and in New England opponents of the war were discussing separation from the Union. The Hartford Convention that met in Connecticut in December 1814 and January 1815 stopped short of such an extreme step but suggested a number of constitutional amendments to restrict federal power.

The British appeared near success in the late summer of 1814. American resistance to the diversionary attack in Chesapeake Bay was so weak that the British, after winning the Battle of Bladensburg (August 24), marched into Washington, D.C., and burned most of the public buildings. President Madison had to flee into the countryside (see Paul Jennings). The British then turned to attack Baltimore but met stiffer resistance and were forced to retire after the American defense of Fort McHenry, which inspired Francis Scott Key to write the words of the "Star-Spangled Banner."

http://www.jmu.edu/madison/center/main_pages/madison_archives/life/war1812/overview.htm

This history is (or used to be before Reagan) taught in elementary school -- as part of the lesson on the Star-Spangled Banner. Shame on you Mr. Gergen.

Other than that, Mr. Gergen, ever the Republican in independent clothing, is simply wrong about whether we need prosecutions.

We need prosecutions more than ever. It is imperative that we show the world that we do not condone and cannot justify torture. To allow those who resorted to these techniques -- ON PEOPLE WHO HAD NOT BEEN TRIED -- AND WHO IN SOME CASES WERE INNOCENT, is a stain on the soul of our nation.

Enter LADY MACBETH, with a taper

Lo you, here she comes! This is her very guise;
and, upon my life, fast asleep. Observe her; stand close.

Doctor
How came she by that light?

Gentlewoman
Why, it stood by her: she has light by her
continually; 'tis her command.

Doctor
You see, her eyes are open.

Gentlewoman
Ay, but their sense is shut.

Doctor
What is it she does now? Look, how she rubs her hands.

Gentlewoman
It is an accustomed action with her, to seem thus
washing her hands: I have known her continue in
this a quarter of an hour.

LADY MACBETH
Yet here's a spot.

Doctor
Hark! she speaks: I will set down what comes from
her, to satisfy my remembrance the more strongly.

LADY MACBETH
Out, damned spot! out, I say!--One: two: why,
then, 'tis time to do't.--Hell is murky!--Fie, my
lord, fie! a soldier, and afeard? What need we
fear who knows it, when none can call our power to
account?--Yet who would have thought the old man
to have had so much blood in him.

http://www.online-literature.com/shakespeare/macbeth/22/

According to Jane Mayer, one suspect (and those tortured were merely suspects at the time) may have died. Please read her book, The Dark Side.

America will be haunted by the spot of our torture until we prosecute those who authorized it.

As for the fact that we require some of our military personnel to undergo these techniques, it is one thing to have someone you trust "torture" you and quite another to be tortured by someone you do not know and who is holding you hostage.

Some of those tortured cannot be convicted of any crime because they are innocent. A mere investigation is not enough. What if the tortured person were your son or daughter or brother or sister? And each of those tortured was someone's son.

In our law, we punish people who fight each other in bars -- but we are not going to punish people who commit these horrible acts to people shackled and in their custody? People who cannot even run away? The pirates are despicable, but how are we different from them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. do you think it's possible that
the cia operatives are being given immunity because that will make them more free to testify against higher-ups?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. An excellent
consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
18. The answer was "yes" Mr Gergen. Bush was lying. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
19. so i take it
there will be an endless loop of "this government does not torture people" on the cable news networks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. 9/11 is their defense
Collapse their story and they have NOTHING! It may not collapse 10 stories a second with no resistance like the towers but it will fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC