|
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 07:34 AM by Apollo11
In fact, it would be fair to say that Senator Kerry played a leading role in encouraging his fellow Democrats to vote for the IWR. An October 2002, Kerry had served almost 18 years in the US Senate. Senator Clinton had served less than 2 years.
Here are a couple of complete paragraphs from an incredibly (and some might say, typically) long and rambling speech that Kerry made to the Senate on October 9, 2002 (one day before Senator Clinton made her speech I already quoted above):
"I believe the record of Saddam Hussein's ruthless, reckless breach of international values and standards of behavior which is at the core of the cease-fire agreement, with no reach, no stretch, is cause enough for the world community to hold him accountable by use of force, if necessary. The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons."
"When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat, and a grave threat, to our security and that of our allies in the Persian Gulf region. I will vote yes because I believe it is the best way to hold Saddam Hussein accountable. And the administration, I believe, is now committed to a recognition that war must be the last option to address this threat, not the first, and that we must act in concert with allies around the globe to make the world's case against Saddam Hussein."
Link to full speech: www.c-span.org/vote2004/kerryspeech.asp
|