George gets a blow job, it's on film and he lies under oath. Impeachment?

[Cyrano]

Okay, we all know the answer is no. The real question is what excuse do the hypocrite thugs use?

And, no. Following God's orders doesn't count.

[Marr]

1. They'd say his sex life is personal.

No one on television would even mention the double standard.

If, by some quirk of fate, someone DID mention it- it'd be followed by a "9-11 Changed Everything©".

[tridim]

2. Can't comment on an ongoing investigation

Next question.

[Der Blaue Engel]

3. They'd use the exact words the Democrats used about

how it had nothing to do with National Security and that the President's sex life was irrelevant. Only this time, the answer is accepted as reasonable and the whole thing is dropped. Democrats are further lampooned for being "liberal prudes" who want to control a little "heterosexual fun."

[Atman]

4. It's Clinton's fault for introducing the culture of blowjobs to the WH

It's always Clinton's fault.

[Bluebear]

5. This is a PERSONAL matter. Why does the liberal media elite pry...

...into personal matters blah blah blah he accepted Christ and is a sinner like you and me but forgiven blah blah blah blah had no business airing this film on TV what about the children blah blah blah and Clinton did it first.

[noamnety]

6. Have you seen the film?

It appears to be 15mm, not 16mm, which isn't even a valid film type given the circumstances of where it was supposedly taken. Plus the letter spacing in the closed captioning appears to be wider than standard. Obviously a forgery.

Who taped this? Did they work at one of those liberal news stations?

[Rude Horner]

7. During a time of war,

we have no right to question a wartime president. Don't you see the distinction? :sarcasm:

[davidthegnome]

8. Har

Well, considering how many he's given Cheney, I don't think this is cause for concern.

[cassiepriam]

9. Bush would convince us the film was a fake, only Dem propaganda.

And Americans would believe him :(

[uppityperson]

10. Is there a film?

[Cyrano]

17. Didn't you get the memo???

[uppityperson]

18. I guess my considering volunteering won't be necessary then

whew, wipe brow

[pnwmom]

11. They'd say, "This is all old news. We've addressed this issue before."

[Warpy]

12. Hon, if Stupid was caught buggering a 5 year old boy on the

South Lawn with all major media present, the right wing screechers would be out there making sure his cult repeated the phrase "proof of his touching love for little children" endlessly. The MSM would suppress the film for at least a year, opening the whole business to charges of editing when it finally did manage to get leaked to a pedophile website.

Even sex won't do it. We need to sweep the GOP and the enabler Democrats the hell out of Congress. Now.

[Ready4Change]

13. Attractive Blonde female vacationer missing in Quebec.

Film at 11.

[iamahaingttta]

14. What excuse would they use?

"Holy shit! Did you see the mushroom clouds over New York?!?!?"

...

[OPERATIONMINDCRIME]

15. Why The Hell Should He Be????

I mean, he only did it for the sake of national security. To call him out for it would be irresponsible. Ya know, you'd be supporting the terrorists. How in the world was the BJ necessary for national security you ask? I can't tell you. It's classified. If I gave the details it would expose a top secret program and would aid the terrorists. We just can't do that in a post 9/11 world. Impeaching for BJ's is such a pre-9/11 mentality. We are fighting a war on terror and keeping you all safe. Questioning the national security BJ undermines our troops morale and is reckless. That is all, as I cannot comment further on this ongoing investigation.

[OrangeCountyDemocrat]

16. Even If Hillary C. Is Giving The Blow Job....

He still would Not be impeached by these Assholes.

[Cyrano]

19. They'd probably bring Hillary up on charges for attacking his weener.

[onenote]

20. he's might be impeached, but he wouldn't be convicted

The repubs can sit on their hands, since the Democrats would be in an awkward position voting to convict on exactly the same charge on which they voted to acquit Clinton. Remember, it takes 2/3 vote in the Senate to convict...

onenote

[Rocknrule]

21. "At least it proves he's not gay"

And if he gets it from Lieberman or Gannon?
"Uhhhhhh....this is an example of how the evil homoseckshual agenda has corrupted even Our Glorious Leader!"