Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grading Our MBA President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:08 AM
Original message
Grading Our MBA President
Grading Our MBA President
By William Fisher
t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Sunday 09 April 2006

There is a consensus among CEOs and business school professors that there are just short of a dozen indispensable characteristics that are essential for an effective chief executive. Since the current chief executive of America Inc. is the first to hold a Masters degree in Business Administration, how does George W. Bush stack up?

What are these basic tenets? And how's our president doing?

1. Have a coherent vision for your organization's future.

When he ran for President in 2000, the cornerstones of George W. Bush's vision for America were a more competitive but more compassionate market economy, more "ownership" of more things by more people, a better-educated, healthier, more self-reliant and more ethical population that believed in the power of religious faith and acted accordingly, all working together under a smaller, more fiscally responsible government dedicated to maintaining a leadership role in the world. By example, America would continue to be the light at the end of the tunnel for the oppressed, the punished, the persecuted.

It was not until after the attacks of 9/11 that we heard anything about the president's mission to "spread democracy" throughout the world.

GWB promised to be a "uniter." Yet today, six years on, the US is more sharply divided about more things than at any time since our post-Civil War history.

As globalization has changed patterns of production and consumption, we are less, not more, competitive on the world stage. It may be only natural for business to outsource jobs that can be performed more cost-effectively elsewhere, but our economy has been unable to replace the jobs it has lost with higher-skilled and better-paying ones. A substantial proportion of our higher-skilled workers - engineers, scientists, information technologists - come from other countries as visitors or immigrants. The President's "No Child Left Behind" initiative was a positive start, but it has been woefully under-funded. Every international test shows us lagging far behind other industrialized countries in the skills we need to fill the jobs of the future - principally science and mathematics. More than 40 million people are without health care, millions of others continue to live below the poverty line, and the gap between "haves" and "have-nots" has become a chasm.

More: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040906Z.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. What could we possibly expect....
from a student who achieved higher levels of academia with "social promotions" rather than honest, work obtained results. "Gentleman's C's" were the order of the day for the spoiled, rich legacy who's family name was the only reason he was ever admitted in the first place. :eyes: A slacker. He was a slacker then and he's a slacker now. The problem being that instead of fucking up a Chem Lab 101 experiment with remarkable ease he's fucking up and entire planet. And no matter what his grade in this exercise, the outcome will be long-lasting and most often irreversible. There are no "Gentleman's C's" on the world stage. There is either success or failure and George W. Bush has failed. Miserably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. telephone pollster
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 07:28 AM by radfringe
last week from christian science monitor called the house - my partner opted to do the poll

one of the questions was "on a scale of 1-5 (1 low, 5 high) how do you rate the president's performance"

my partner replied "anything lower than a 1?"

pollster: (chuckling) no, sorry, but we do get asked that alot....

on edit: note - this was before the feces hit the rotating blades about the leaks leading to bush*'s office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Grade? F.......He has failed his Mission, his People, The Planet, and
his Faith. In addition, he has failed the Pub Party...but then, the Pub Party had to know this dude was not a good contender but backed him anyway...making them accessories to the fact....They too get an F.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. using the Hogwarts OWL grade system
he would get a "T" for troll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Harvard's MBA program
Should lose their accreditation for 'awarding' a degree to a monstrosity like Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. C'mon, his Poppy paid in full for that sheepskin!
It was affirmative action at its best! The feeble-minded and chronically lazy sons of the white massas are pulled up by their bootstraps and lifted into the upper class professions--as it was and shall always be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well I guess it is appropriate they use 'sheepskin' then
Although it is degrading to the sheep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. When describing the Bush administration in business terms
the inescapable comparison is the mafia "bust-out".

The crime organization takes over a legitimate business by force and intimidation, usually capitalizing on some or overextension, and proceeds to use the assets and credit line of the ligitimate business to funnel great amounts of funds into its own coffers. They don't pay the creditors and the business ultimately is ruined, but the criminal organization is scott-free and much richer. Bushco is doing this to America on a massive scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lena inRI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Not even an F. . .

EXPEL the sociopath!


:kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC