If Bush had told the truth to investigators, it would have been all over.

[FormerRepublican]

So if Fitz is still digging around, then isn't it an indicator that Bush and Cheney lied to him? What does Fitz need in order to take it to the next level and take on Rove, Cheney, and/or Bush?

[leftyladyfrommo]

1. Oh, get serious. Bush wouldn't know the Truth if it hit him in the

face.

[blm]

2. DAMN - that's a great point.

Remember how all the talk show hosts used that to attack Clinton? Let's see how many deal with Bush's refusal to tell the truth to the prosecutor.

[Virginia Dare]

5. Exactly....

Clinton was impeached because he allegedly lied under oath. Bush claimed when he ran for office that he was going to bring integrity back to the Office of the President. Let's just see him squirm out of this one.

[sinkingfeeling]

3. I see Watergate. Cover-ups are always worst than the crime and

bring down the biggest fish.

[pdxmom]

4. Hmmm...I wonder if Judy Miller would have a cause for action based

on Bushco's withholding of the facts? Judy is obviously a tool of the administration, but she's now a has-been and a case against Bush would put her back in that spotlight she so dearly craves.

[Jane Austin]

6. So, do we get to send the bill for the investigation to bush?

Seems only fair.

[carolinalady]

7. Bush can not tell the truth about it because it was against the law.

There is no Fourth ammendment to twist and bend this time.

[salin]

8. Well shake it up baby... *twist and shout* ... Contort your story Baby...

*twist and shout*... Comeon find a way to spin it Baby... *twist ands shout*... but it will still all come out *all come out*

[skip fox]

9. Yes, and even though W. refused to speak to investigators under oath

the fact that he refused to do so and hired a oprivate attorney indicates that if he diseminated, that he WILLFULLY AND KNOWLINGLY mislead the prosecutor of a federal crime.

(Wasn't this what cooked Martha Stewart?)