Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"U.S. War Plan Leaked to Iraqis by Russian Ambassador"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 10:20 PM
Original message
"U.S. War Plan Leaked to Iraqis by Russian Ambassador"
Edited on Thu Mar-23-06 10:21 PM by kpete

March 23, 2006 —

Iraq Archive Document Alleges Russian Official Described Locations, Troops, Tanks and Other Forces Before Operation Iraqi Freedom Began

Documents dated March 5-8, 2003

Two Iraqi documents dated in March 2003 — on the eve of the U.S.-led invasion — and addressed to the secretary of Saddam Hussein, describe details of a U.S. plan for war. According to the documents, the plan was disclosed to the Iraqis by the Russian ambassador.

The first document (CMPC-2003-001950) is a handwritten account of a meeting with the Russian ambassador that details his description of the composition, size, location and type of U.S. military forces arrayed in the Gulf and Jordan. The document includes the exact numbers of tanks, armored vehicles, different types of aircraft, missiles, helicopters, aircraft carriers, and other forces, and also includes their exact locations. The ambassador also described the positions of two Special Forces units.

The second document (CMPC-2004-001117) is a typed account, signed by Deputy Foreign Minister Hammam Abdel Khaleq, that states that the Russian ambassador has told the Iraqis that the United States was planning to deploy its force into Iraq from Basra in the South and up the Euphrates, and would avoid entering major cities on the way to Baghdad, which is, in fact what happened. The documents also state "Americans are also planning on taking control of the oil fields in Kirkuk." The information was obtained by the Russians from "sources at U.S. Central Command in Doha, Qatar," according to the document.

This document also includes an account of an amusing incident in which several Iraqi Army officers (presumably seeking further elaboration of the U.S. war plans) contacted the Russian Embassy in Baghdad and stated that the ambassador was their source. Needless to say, this caused great embarrassment to the ambassador, and the officers were instructed "not to mention the ambassador again in that context."

(Editor's Note: The Russian ambassador in March 2003 was Vladimir Teterenko. Teterenko appears in documents released by the Volker Commission, which investigated the Oil for Food scandal, as receiving allocations of 3 million barrels of oil — worth roughly $1.5 million. )

more at:
http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah this is good
Of course this proves how we can't trust our allies and how President Bush was right to turn his back on the rest of the world.

Or at least that is how certain will spin it.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well yes perhaps but WTF are they gonna do
when the rest of the world on whom bush has turned his back
a. decides that we are they terraists and
b. gets together, gangs up on us and comes here to kick our ass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. But he looked into Putin's eyes and saw trust
and Putin looked into Bush's eyes and thought "gullible schmuck"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Allies?...
Um, whatever.

Russia spies on the US. This should not be shocking. They didn't support the US invasion. This should not be shocking either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. if i remember correctly, didn't we do this on purpose and give them false
locations so that the invasion would be easier?

We said we would come from one place and "gave it to them" and then came from another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Correct. We also destroyed whatever defense they had left. before the,...
,...occupation.

This is a silly story to suddenly appear.

Silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. As if Iraq had an actual army that could do anything
with this information. We could have told the Iraqis the exact order of battle for all of our units and it would not have made a bit of difference. Gulf Farce II was one of the most one-sided wars in recent history. I suppose our 'invasions' of Grenada and Panama were more lopsided, but just barely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC