Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Actor Tries To Trademark 'N' word

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 03:52 PM
Original message
Actor Tries To Trademark 'N' word
As I live and breathe ...
The actor Damon Wayans has been engaged in a 14-month fight to trademark the term "Nigga" for a clothing line and retail store, a search of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's online database reveals.

Wayans wants to dress customers in 14 kinds of attire from tops to bottoms, and use the controversial mark on "clothing, books, music and general merchandise," as well as movies, TV and the internet, according to his applications.

Read the whole damned thing at http://www.wired.com/news/technology/1,70259-0.html
So, is Wayans making a statement about our bone-headed Intellectual Property laws, or has he become a greedhead? Or something else?

--p!
Of COURSE it's true. I saw it on the Internet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Abraham Lincoln and MLK must be rolling in their graves...
This is like some KKK fantasy come true:

"Hey, let's have all the black people wear the n-word across their chests!"

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_testify_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. I saw a comedian once talk about applying the N word to
a brand name, in order to take the power away from the word - especially for a something positive, like a product everyone likes. Maybe that's part of this?

Her bit was something along the lines of using it for a brand of snack crackers - People would say "Oooh! Sour cream & onion niggers! Who brought those?!" The eventual punchline was that they would not be available in BBQ flavored. Poor taste, I know. But funny...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm going to trademark the term "clothing." nt
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 04:04 PM by SmokingJacket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I've already trademarked the letter "C"
so you'll have to call it something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Damn! There goes my great idea! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Trademark law is not the same as copyright law. It's not a monopoly
on using a word in all contexts. It's the right to use a word to identify a product that precludes other people from calling their products the same thing.

If you spent your life making and marketing a an innovative new catheter and you called it "C", you wouldn't want some Indonesian company to make a knock-off of dangerously inferior quality that killed people to call their catheter "C", would you?

You don't think that's fair do you? And it's not just for your sake. It's for customers' sake too. Occassionaly, trademark law is a matter of life and death for the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. You can't. It's descriptive. Can't trademark descriptive words.
Unless, you're calling something that isn't clothing "clothing." That would be OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. can't do it
you cannot trademark derogatory terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. So I can't trademark a line of clothes called "Coulterwear"?
There goes "Schwartezenegga", too.

It so tough being an Equal Opportunity Offender™ these days!

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's insane.
And TOTALLY inappropriate.

BushCo is already setting civil rights back...why would someone want to aid and abet in that, and embolden racists even MORE?

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoosier Democrat Donating Member (386 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Why would anyone want to???
The simple answer is MONEY. I am now fully convinced that we are living in some sort of "Cultural End Times". No one has any decency anymore and just about anything is for sale.

I wonder if this was how it was in Rome during the reigns of the "Mad Emperors"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Do you have any black friends?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. I hate things like this.....
I'm a black woman and I hate to see this because it makes it okay for the ones coming up to use this word and terminology to call one another. What's next? A female celebrity starting a lingerie line emblazoned with the term, "Ho' Bitch" in rhinestones across the chest and seat of their clothing?:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I HATE that word in all its varieties. I remember when people USED
it ALL the time. I was hoping when it was dying out that it would go. This is very disturbing to those of us old enough to remember what it really means and how disappointed MLK and all the rest who suffered real hell for advances in our humanity together would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Amen, Rogue, Amen. nt
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Dykes on Bikes" and their battle for trademark
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 04:35 PM by DesertedRose
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/12/09/MNGQOG5D7P1.DTL&type=gaylesbian

"A lesbian motorcycle group in San Francisco declared victory Thursday in their fight for a federal trademark for the name "Dykes on Bikes."

The U.S. Patent and Trademark office twice rejected the group's application on the grounds the term "dyke" was offensive and derogatory. The office reversed itself after the group's lawyers appealed, submitting hundreds of pages of additional material that they said showed the slang word does not disparage lesbians.

"The applicant came in at the last moment with a lot of evidence to show that the community did not consider it disparaging," said Lynne Beresford, a U.S. commissioner for trademarks.

Vick Germany, president of the San Francisco Women's Motorcycle Contingent, a.k.a. Dykes on Bikes, called the decision a huge victory. "The word dyke has been used to put us down, and we have taken that name and reclaimed it as a source of pride," Germany said."

I think the difference here is that there are still plenty in the A-A community who realize the 'n' word as disparaging, derogatory and offensive, and I doubt Wayans would see the same kind of support for his endeavor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Please don't let it be greed!
God, I hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'll probably get royally flamed for this one but.....
.....I'll bet not one word would be said if someone wanted to trademark the word "honky" for a line of merchandise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. Calling any of the Wayans' brothers actors is taking the piss
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC