Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just a thought...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
opusprime Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 03:41 PM
Original message
Just a thought...
but I assumed the President already had this power.

And if you think about it from a law enforcement perspective, so do most COPS.

I'm not saying its right, but I'm not saying it's wrong either.

Was the fourth plane over Penn. on 9/11 shot down?

And if it was, would the President be guilty of murder of those civilians?

I think this subject is a little more complex than it seems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Power to assassinate people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess the first thing you'd have to find out is...
whether it was the President and not Cheney who gave the order to shoot down the plane... from what I understand, it was Cheney barking out orders from the White House bunker while Chimpy McCokespoon was still reading "My Pet Goat" in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. what is necessary and reasonable. If other effective options exist
is "killing" not still murder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Funny how you have picked up the latest rw prattle so quickly.
The 4th plane thing is on the lips of every bullshit rw dickless right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opusprime Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Thanks...
dont argue the point, just insinuate I'm something else.

Funny, I recognize that tactic from rw prattle as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Argue what? The whole assertion is meaningless in this context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Lot of reason to believe it was.
One reason to think so is that if the hijackers lived, they might have a very interesting story to tell about who they were involved with.
If you haven't read David Ray Griffin's 'New Pearl Harbor' please do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. I have read he has the power to order a shoot down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. I do not credit them with that much competence
They had one hour's notification for the plane that hit the Pentagon. Andrews AFB is about ten miles from the Pentagon, and yet they could not defend it. That plane should have been shot down - every passenger died anyway. Shooting it down only saves lives and destruction in the target area. Is there a link that says they did shoot it down? Is it credible? I stopped keeping up on this in mid 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. No It's Quite Simple...
the law is the law until Congress changes the law. The administration was asked if the FISA law needed to be updated. They said no. Of course, now that we live in a country ruled by men, rather than law...it's a case by case basis...for example....if you or I do it...we broke the law, and we're going to jail. If someone 'connected' does it...they were within their rights. Really very simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opusprime Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I think we're jumping threads...
I didnt say anything about FISA.

I just asked if the President had the authority to kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC