Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do public owned companies have to disclose when they shut down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:53 AM
Original message
Do public owned companies have to disclose when they shut down
100 out of 300 offices or branches. Dont they have to announce a RIF reduction in force?

Something is going on at Portamedic, a subsidiary of Hooper Holmes "HH"
they are closing at least two centers but there is no mention of the closings either on their web site or the financial trade news.

A previous HH news release stated that HH 3rd qtr revenues were way off but cost saving measures were in place.

Can a corporation just close offices with no notice to the share holders or the general public until the day of the event?

And if so shouldnt there be news release on the closing event?

Any info would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

8643


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, it would possibly trigger the WARN Act, but that governs
how you have to treat employees (and helps state agencies prepare for a whole bunch of unemployment claims) -- but they don't have to tell the public
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks, I'll research the WARN Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. If they are a public company
They maybe had to make some sort of filings with various state & federal regulatory agencies. It would definitely be in quarterly financial reports (look up the company's latest 10-Q or 10-K filings on the SEC website.

If it has a big effect on the local economy, town or city officials probably had some sort of clue as well - the company may have approached them by saying, "unless we get a tax break of $xxx, then we'll be closing 2 of our plants."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Thanks, after reading the WARN Act, these people have no shot.
As all the branches are typically 12 or less employees.

I'll check out the the SEC web site thanks for the info.

8643
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. You are talking about a couple small offices right?
Porta-medic sends nurses out to clients homes to do medical questionaires, blood and urine testing for insurance companies. We have a few small local offices near-by. I do not think that they would need a news release for shutting one down. Maybe if they shut down an entire region or division.

Just my 2 cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. The rumor is 100 out of 300 small branches.
I believe they intend to retain the contractor examiners but reduce the number of offices supporting them. So more examiners reporting into fewer offices farther away.

I suspect that this will be an opportunity for their competition. Oh well the Insurance mafia might get a little less service
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. In NC at least, companies laying off above a certain number of
people in a given month must notify the state government. Hence the "stealth layoff" practice of laying off 49 people when the limit is 50 for a notification (not sure of the exact numbers, but you get the idea).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. It would surprise me not. I called the parent company, they offered no info.
Good news for the shareholders of the parent company Hooper Holmes their stock is up 0.97% from 3 bucks to around 3.13.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC