|
Edited on Fri Dec-08-06 02:09 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
a militant atheist in your posts.
You seem to forget or be ignorant of the fact that Christian's don't have the right in the eyes of the God that they believe in, to make no outward reference to their convictions concerning the whole Christian story. We don't believe in this open-ended definition of freedom, as a licence to do whatever we think is OK, i.e. the freedom of Lucifer. We believe (as I strongly suspect you do, despite our arguments), that freedom implies responsibility. This enormous domestic and geopolitical debacle your country is undergoing at the moment is a direct result of the "Freedoms" venerated and preached by your far-right capitalists. The freedoms to downsize and outsource on the most specious of rationales, for example.
The American Dream (I should say "erstwhile American Dream", since, thanks to our friends, the corporatists, the US is lagging far behind in terms of life opportunities) is not a million miles from building your house on sand - as an earlier set of Republican miscreants found out not so long ago. Though some, to their immense credit, saw the light. Unfortnately, the Christian Church has historically tended not heed Christ's parable of the dishonest steward, and been ambiguous, to say the least, in its commitment to God in terms of in its relationship to Mammon, with the result that ambition has arguably come to at least seem to be the sovereign virtue.
And if you think your legal system could be any kind of substitute for an over-arching national mainstream religion, you're living in a fool's paradise. Just as mankind's most dangerous miscreants tend to rise to the top of societies, they are the ones who finally decide what the laws should be. Take the Supremes. No, better not. But unfortunately you didn't have a choice in 2000.
We believe that Christianity is of the greatest relevance to improving the lot of mankind in an increasingly insane world. Like it or lump it.
I regularly read thread-headers of loony posts in worshipful praise of a militant atheist character called Dawkins, but I don't feel threatened by it, so I'm happy with it. Go for your life guys and gals!
On the other hand, it's evident that you feel threatened by references here to Christianity, which is why I simply responded, "Good for you!" in reply to an earlier post of yours, in which you said something like I'm convinced there is no God in a challenging, combative kind of tone. Why do you think Christians want to hear about your lack of belief, any more than you want to hear about our belief? Were we supposed to take your opinion as authoritative? Or argue with you? That was the what your tone suggested. Forget it. Your antipathy or indifference to Christianity is of very marginal interest to us, if at all.
It's likely to be a phase you're going through. People change their beliefs for or against at different times of their lives. You might never change yours, but you might well, at some time in the future. But unless this board becomes the exclusive preserve of atheists, no doubt you're going to continue to hear Christians mention some aspect of their faith, as well as many agnostics, for that matter.
Christ's socio-economic teachings are timeless, because ambitious and materialistic human beings have turned upside down the true spiritual priorities, and made the world in their own image. "Man is only a breath. Great men are nothing; they weigh less than a breath." And of course you'll hear some people who believe in something - which I'm not clear about. Maybe a guiding spirit - say, "I'm sending good thoughts your way", when the person has said that they or a loved one is sick or otherwise suffering.
|