Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In 2008, who will be the Democratic Populist Candidate to challenge the Corporatists?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:13 PM
Original message
Poll question: In 2008, who will be the Democratic Populist Candidate to challenge the Corporatists?
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 10:16 PM by omega minimo
This is The Question.


:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. John Kerry.
DLC outsider
Former prosecutor
Believes the government is for the people by the people
Honesty and integrity
defender of what is right and moral
compassion for the people
a fighter
Not to mention intelligent and loaded with experience in foreign relations, finance, small business, environmental issues etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. All rightey then.... (and rightful President)... and will he stand against the Corporatists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Out of curiosity, why did you put Durbin in the poll?
Everything I know about him suggests that he is perfectly content with being a senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Could only think of two Populists
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Dorgan would be a better choice with his criticism of trade policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Dorgan...now there's an idea!
Anyone know whether he is interested in being president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. DORGAN! Holy Shite! This poll is Bogus! DORGAN for Other!!
:blush:

Got my Dorgans and Durbins mexed up.

Byron Dorgan "TAKE THIS JOB AND SHIP IT' for President!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StoryTeller Donating Member (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Yep. He's done so in the past.
That's why he's been such a target for both parties. He's got more integrity and principle in one finger than practically all the rest of them put together. I trust him--he makes decisions from what he really believes to be the best for the PEOPLE. And most of the time, he's absolutely right.

We could make an entire thread out of all the ways Kerry has been proven correct, especially since 2004.

He may not label himself as "populist" but he does consider himself to be a public servant, and he has never been in politics for the sake of currying power for himself. He's honestly there to serve the country, and that's a really rare motivation these days, it seems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Yes, he can see they are ruining our country and have to much control and very little accountability
A true people's president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superman Returns Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Edwards no doubt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. If only James Webb had been elected in 2002.
I have high expectations for him, based on his rhetoric. We'll see if he can back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hillary Clinton will be the nominee
great campaigner, oodles of money, well known, just off of a landslide re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. ...will be the Corporatist nominee. What Populist will challenge that?
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 10:56 PM by omega minimo
This is The Question.

This recent election proved that Republican Lite is not the way to go. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Populism is the wave of the future.
America has had its fill of elitism, authoritarianism, corporatism, and aristocracy. You're right about the election; What else could an election that sends men like Webb, Sherrod Brown, Bernie Sanders, and John Tester and women like Amy Klobuchar and Claire McCaskill mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Sustainability is Survival
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Myths and spin!
She has never ran in a difficult campaign.
Her landslide victory was due to a poor performing and weak Republican opposer.
She has "oodles" of money -yes, but money can only get you so far. You can't force or bribe the voters into voting for you.
And, as for being well known, that is true, but many, many, many, many many people I talk with do not like her and do not want to see her anywhere near a presidency- and they are only the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Same old same old "Lesser of Evils" is unacceptable
:thumbsdown:
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StoryTeller Donating Member (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. John Kerry
At least I really, really hope so. See Wisteria's post up thread. She summed it up pretty well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. the real question: who is the most progressive candidate corporatists/chamber of commerce will let
slip through and win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moloch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
21. Edwards couldn't even win a debate with dick cheney...
and did only slightly better than joe lieberman.

Either one of the Illinois senators would be a better candidate than Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Only if you were watching Faux News
"Edwards couldn't even win a debate with dick cheney"

Anyone with eyes to see knows who won that debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moloch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. I don't remember what channel i watched the debate on...
but I can assure you that it wasn't faux news.

Edwards was supposed to be the great hope for The Democratic Party.. he was assumed to have comparable debating skills to Bill Clinton and all of our hopes were especially high after Kerry trounced bush in their debate.

On Iraq, Edwards pointed out that there was no link between saddam hussein and al-qaida but that was pretty much the extent of his argument against the war. He let cheney get away with spewing the same old lies about iraq with little protest at all.

Polls for the Edwards-cheney debate was mixed (Kerry overwhelmingly won all of his) when Edwards really should have cleaned dick's clock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
22. John Edwards. He has the track record
and you can bet they see him as enemy number 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Well I won't forget that "track" record....Co-sponsoring Patriot Act AND IWR
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 01:48 AM by FrenchieCat
and the voting for both with glee.

That's the track record...

then saying "sorry"......that's the track record.

The populists stuff has just been since he's been running....conveniently!

Economic justice is important.....but my civil rights and this fucked up war has done so much damage till it ain't even funny! :(

Guess enough people can be fooled enough of the time--again! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I thought the OP meant the corporatists or corporations in relatinship to economic policy and tort
law. I didn't take it as the neocon, or neoliberal, or empire project.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
24. Simple: Al Gore
He'll be there, count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerstin Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. I second the sentiment.
Al's populist acceptance speech at the 2000 Democratic convention swung his numbers by some 20%. Plus he comes by it naturally. Al Gore Sr. was a much beloved populist senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I third it
What could be more populist than the internet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC