Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Silicon Valley have those horrible machines ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 07:57 PM
Original message
Does Silicon Valley have those horrible machines ?
I would think the voters of Silicon Valley would be horrified of those machines. Yes, I know not everyone in Silicon Valley is tech savvy. Just a random thought on Election night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Santa Clara County is getting dirtier and dirtier every year.
One DUer went in for poll work training and was instructed to discourage people from using paper ballots. And they are not intending to post precinct totals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. San Mateo Co. had one new voting machine

all the rest were paper voting booths. I went for the machine, since I had my camera with me. And I'm not all that sure about paper ballots being counted either. But things went very well. We can hope.


:dem:

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. We do have paper trail printers on our Diebolds here.
After you go through the 17 (!yes, 17!) screens of voting, it displays on the screen a summary of your votes. If you say that's right, they print out a summary on a scrolling paper under a glass shield, for you to review. Then if you say that's right, your vote gets recorded.

After the report of a DUer who's working a polling place said they're discouraging paper ballots and doing a convoluted process with them (you mark a sample ballot, then an election worker copies your votes to a real ballot, and an optical scanner--I think--scans that one), I decided that the paper trail Diebold sounded more secure. Especially since the county election head that made that decision sounded like such an a-hole.

BTW, I work in a software company. After the 2004 heist, I said I thought Diebold stole it, and even the very liberal and very (very) smart software engineers thought I was out of my mind. Even after I told them about changing the exit polls in the middle of the night. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC