|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:24 PM Original message |
I am very, very disappointed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. It could be time to elect some real Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtime dfl_er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. or it could be too late |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. It was up to the Judiciary Committee hearings. Media spun fulltime against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-27-06 10:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
60. BLM, You Have To Stop Blaming The Media. The Democrats Need To |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 02:44 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. disappointed???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
converted_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. I agree with you completely.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Seems to me the leadership HAS been fighting for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
converted_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Bullshit they have..There are a couple that are fighting, but that's it.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baby_mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
34. There's a communication block here, I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dl5192 (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
29. Your ass is on the line??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
converted_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:02 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. It's the truth... I signed up for a peace group, I gave to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dl5192 (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:36 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. Sounds interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
converted_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:36 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. It isn't tin foil at all.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:35 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. all democratic asses are on the line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. WHO has folded? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
converted_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 05:29 PM Response to Reply #43 |
53. Take a good look at the legislation that has passed recently... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sproutster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-27-06 10:45 AM Response to Reply #29 |
61. hell if it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. i am almost speechless. the minute they start fighting for it, yawl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. But there are no political consequences for not filibustering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Perhaps we can rationally find candidates to oppose them in the primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Why the hell do you think they put it off until now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:38 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. I am patient & they have to run every two years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Senators run every SIX years, not two. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Please Walt I fully understand that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:03 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. I have a (D) Senator who is up for re-election this year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
7. I haven't heard any fat ladies singing yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
9. my gosh kentuck...... can you find something else to bitch about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:39 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Yeah, I could find something else to bitch about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
13. Seems to me that the Dem leaders have been downplaying the possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. You are probably correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. It's damned tough, all right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Exactly why our leadership should have had the votes in line... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:56 PM Response to Reply #23 |
44. More likely they are behind closed doors saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. Does anyone wonder if Harry Reid's pro-life stances on abortion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
46. "The only arm twisting that appears to be going on in the Democratic ranks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 05:35 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. The DLC is the one that just said they didn't want a fillibuster! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-27-06 09:36 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Dupe. Self delete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-27-06 09:37 AM Response to Reply #55 |
58. The DLC drives me nuts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
14. Isn't it a little early for a postmortem? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marnieworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
15. Has there been a vote? A call for cloture? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
21. I expect every REAL Democrat to vote against cloture... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Just say NO to the GOP! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:53 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Gotta clean house inside first! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:52 PM Response to Reply #28 |
42. We don't have the luxury or the time to clean house first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:57 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. We need to catapult the propaganda... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
27. I swear, sometimes I wish I was a member of the brain dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
33. Won't we have 41 to support a filibuster? I thought we had 44 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:22 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Oh here I go-yes the gang of fourteen agreement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 02:40 PM Response to Reply #33 |
63. You called it a long time ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
35. It's getting down to the nitty-gritty... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
38. I don't think they raised any expectations of a filibuster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:03 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. You are probably correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
47. The Democratic leadership never raised the expectations of a filibuster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 05:08 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. They've never raised expectations of representing us either! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
48. Kentuck, I'm Not So Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 05:11 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. There may still be hope... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
51. What makes you think we are being told the whole truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 05:15 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. If this is true, it would be a devastating blow to the Repubs.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 05:31 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Yes. and keep hammering at them and hammering at them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaganPreacher (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-27-06 12:01 AM Response to Reply #52 |
56. A vote on the "nuclear option" would not require 60 votes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-27-06 10:37 AM Response to Reply #56 |
59. Thanks for the clarification! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaganPreacher (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 02:30 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. No, it didn't change- clarification: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Apr 28th 2024, 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC