okieinpain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 05:18 PM
Original message |
| oh crap, it's sam greenfield on the tucker show with scarbrough |
|
man I haven't seen him or should I say heard him since the 2000 election. man he's great....
|
Gabi Hayes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. he's not doing so much for me; getting gang banged by Joe S and |
|
some ahole wingnut lawyer. not making many good points, other than saying that she should be reprimanded for making 'liberal' comments someplace, which apparently violates the paper's standards
he's not making the obvious point that her work should be scrutinized for bias; analyzed for accuracy/bias
how hard it that?
they keep interrupting him all the time, too
|
okieinpain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. ah man, i like sam. he's pretty good. he use to be on a radio show |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-12-06 05:24 PM by okieinpain
that was ran by a paper in new york, I think the paper was called the forward, or something like that.
|
Gabi Hayes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. I just thought hecould have done a better job of defending NYT |
|
supreme court reporter Greenhouse, who they accused of having, GASP!, a liberal agenda!
what does that pigeyed cretin expect? he alwasy accuses them of being liberal. what's his fricking POINT?
he said she shouldn't have written that she hoped the coming court would stand by the long held prinicipal of stare decisis, then cited a case involving sodomy in which she disagreed with it. why didn't you pick Dredd Scott for your anomaly, you creep?
he also didn't get much of a chance to talk, so it wasn't really a fair chance to see what he's got. it was a REALLY slanted segment: they talked over him (JS mostly) constantly
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Jun 20th 2013, 12:52 AM
Response to Original message |