Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

oh crap, it's sam greenfield on the tucker show with scarbrough

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 05:18 PM
Original message
oh crap, it's sam greenfield on the tucker show with scarbrough
man I haven't seen him or should I say heard him since the 2000 election. man he's great....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. he's not doing so much for me; getting gang banged by Joe S and
some ahole wingnut lawyer. not making many good points, other than saying that she should be reprimanded for making 'liberal' comments someplace, which apparently violates the paper's standards

he's not making the obvious point that her work should be scrutinized for bias; analyzed for accuracy/bias

how hard it that?

they keep interrupting him all the time, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. ah man, i like sam. he's pretty good. he use to be on a radio show
Edited on Thu Oct-12-06 05:24 PM by okieinpain
that was ran by a paper in new york, I think the paper was called the forward, or something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I just thought hecould have done a better job of defending NYT
supreme court reporter Greenhouse, who they accused of having, GASP!, a liberal agenda!

what does that pigeyed cretin expect? he alwasy accuses them of being liberal. what's his fricking POINT?

he said she shouldn't have written that she hoped the coming court would stand by the long held prinicipal of stare decisis, then cited a case involving sodomy in which she disagreed with it. why didn't you pick Dredd Scott for your anomaly, you creep?

he also didn't get much of a chance to talk, so it wasn't really a fair chance to see what he's got. it was a REALLY slanted segment: they talked over him (JS mostly) constantly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 15th 2014, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC