Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feingold on Ed Schulz show saying Reid says not enough votes to filibuster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:52 PM
Original message
Feingold on Ed Schulz show saying Reid says not enough votes to filibuster
Said Reid has done his "due diligence".

Feingold says he is in support of a filibuster.

Supposedly votes are 51-48.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Errr, if he means thats the likely cloture vote
That IS a filibuster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. *sigh* n/t
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 03:54 PM by redqueen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. One more circle left before it's all over
If I'm not mistaken this now will rest in the hands of SCOTUS. After that it's straight down and out to sea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. 48 NO votes was enough for a filibuster - All they needed was 41.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I guess there are people who will vote no, but not fillabuster
That makes no sense to me. They might as well vote "present".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Presumably these are people who are happy to register a losing "no" vote,
in a losing cause, but wouldn't want to go far enough to cause an actual unpleasant dustup.

It's like offering to pay for dinner, with the secret knowledge that your guest is on expense account and will pay. You get the free brownie points but don't have to actually do anything that matters.

Feingold would not name names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. But we can guess who they are - - the Alito filibuster comes to mind.
Some who wouldn't vote for Alito but wouldn't filibiuster him, either. grrrrrr..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. but of course
and WHO pray tell, thought these idiots would do that?

WHO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Feingold was awesome.
I was listening in the car, but for some reason Randi Rhodes (who I don't like much) was on the internet streaming when I got inside with my Thai takeout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. 48 votes is 7 more than they need to filibuster!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. filibuster for the HECK of it!
Somebody GROW A SET!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. No excuse. Those who don't think that this needs to be filibustered, needs
to find a new career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Exactly. I'd be on the NO side of this argument on principle. Guess
Dems really don't mind providing the "bipartisan" support that gets used against them again and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Welcome to the new and improved version
of Pinochet's Chile.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. don't they have to get 60 votes to break a filibuster?
unless the nuclear option is used?

I want Reid gone out of leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. yes, you need 60 yes votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC