Feingold on Ed Schulz show saying Reid says not enough votes to filibuster
Mayberry Machiavelli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 03:52 PM
Original message
Feingold on Ed Schulz show saying Reid says not enough votes to filibuster
Said Reid has done his "due diligence". Feingold says he is in support of a filibuster. Supposedly votes are 51-48.
Greeby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Errr, if he means thats the likely cloture vote
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 03:54 PM by redqueen
Lone_Star_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. One more circle left before it's all over
If I'm not mistaken this now will rest in the hands of SCOTUS. After that it's straight down and out to sea.
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. 48 NO votes was enough for a filibuster - All they needed was 41.
rockymountaindem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I guess there are people who will vote no, but not fillabuster
That makes no sense to me. They might as well vote "present".
Mayberry Machiavelli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Presumably these are people who are happy to register a losing "no" vote,
in a losing cause, but wouldn't want to go far enough to cause an actual unpleasant dustup. It's like offering to pay for dinner, with the secret knowledge that your guest is on expense account and will pay. You get the free brownie points but don't have to actually do anything that matters. Feingold would not name names.
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. But we can guess who they are - - the Alito filibuster comes to mind.
Some who wouldn't vote for Alito but wouldn't filibiuster him, either. grrrrrr..........
Jacobin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
and WHO pray tell, thought these idiots would do that? WHO?
StellaBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
I was listening in the car, but for some reason Randi Rhodes (who I don't like much) was on the internet streaming when I got inside with my Thai takeout.
MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. 48 votes is 7 more than they need to filibuster!!!
Donnachaidh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. filibuster for the HECK of it!
Nutmegger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. No excuse. Those who don't think that this needs to be filibustered, needs
davidwparker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Exactly. I'd be on the NO side of this argument on principle. Guess
Dems really don't mind providing the "bipartisan" support that gets used against them again and again.
LiviaOlivia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Welcome to the new and improved version
davidwparker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. don't they have to get 60 votes to break a filibuster?
unless the nuclear option is used? I want Reid gone out of leadership.
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Sep-28-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. yes, you need 60 yes votes
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.