Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was the ANC wrong for using violence to end a brutal apartheid government?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:32 PM
Original message
Was the ANC wrong for using violence to end a brutal apartheid government?
http://www.cfr.org/publication/10159/

Introduction

For decades, refusing to negotiate with or recognize terrorists has been a basic precept of U.S. foreign policy. As President Bush said in 2002, "Terror must be stopped. No nation can negotiate with terrorists. For there is no way to make peace with those whose only goal is death." Democratic Party members, too, use this terminology, as do politicians abroad.

Yet recent history suggests that precept may not reflect the realities of modern international politics or the way the United States or other nations actually practice diplomacy. Some groups will always remain, as the English kings used to say of ungovernable parts of Ireland, "beyond the Pale." Al-Qaeda may be one of them. Hamas, the Palestinian terrorist organization wrestling with how to react to its electoral victory, may or may not be another. Often, such groups simply burn out as their primary complaints are overtaken by events, or implode in the face of successful counterterrorism efforts.

However, over the past several decades, some groups widely shunned as terrorists by the international community have managed to beat a well-worn path to negotiations, political legitimacy, and even sovereign power. Here is a look at some prominent transformations.


African National Congress (ANC)

Just twenty years ago, Nelson Mandela sat in prison and black South Africans were forbidden from even spending the night in their country's largest cities. U.S. officials helped justify dealings with the apartheid government by pointing to the ANC's place on the State Department's list of terrorist groups.

After a half-century of practicing nonviolence and community activism, the ANC founded a military wing in 1961 that targeted government facilities, the South African military, and some foreign businesses. In the late 1980s, President FW de Klerk, a man sometimes called "the South African Gorbachev," released Mandela from jail and began talks to bring blacks into the political process. The ANC became a legal political party in 1990, and Mandela was elected president in 1994, just a year after he and de Klerk shared the Nobel Peace Prize. South Africa's current president, Thabo Mbeki, was a key Mandela deputy throughout the ANC's many years in the political wilderness. He remains the most influential of the ANC's leaders.

http://www.anc.org.za/

The day the enemy struck us a blow

It is twenty-five years this week since the assassination of ANC leader Joe Nzingo Gqabi in Ashdown Park, Harare. A quarter of a century after his assassination at the hands of the apartheid government, Joe Gqabi's legacy as a dedicated, disciplined and effective revolutionary leader continues. • More...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nelson Mandela TERRORIST!
Should have bombed his ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
2.  Mandela and the ANC were South Africans fighting for freedom
in South Africa

they weren't calling for the destruction of a neighboring country and lobbing rockets across the border and sending suicide bombers into another country to kill it's citizens

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GAPeace Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reagan and the Israelis treated him like a terrorist
He was on the terrorist watch list for how long again?

He hasn't forgotten that experience of the US-Israeli support for Apartheid. Americans may not remember. He does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Bush met with Mandela at the White House in November 9, 2001...
...http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/11/20011109-9.html

And then Bush removed Mandela from the US terror list in August of 2003.

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=3&art_id=ct20030810102700522T600578

Mandela's name comes off US terror list

The good news is that the United States government has removed Nelson Mandela, Tokyo Sexwale and Sidney Mufamadi from its list of global terrorists.

The bad news is that the removal is only for the next 10 years. George Bush, the US president, and consular officials privately informed the three men during Bush's recent visit to South Africa, according to an official US source.

The US state department is reviewing the status of hundreds of listed South Africans. Some were listed for having convictions against them for terrorism, sabotage, treason or related offences against the apartheid state. Others were members of the guerrilla army, Umkhonto we Sizwe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GAPeace Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Not until 2003 are you serious?!
Our nation is shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Mandela is friends with Castro
and the Cubans gave them military support while asking nothing in return.

of course he was a terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. particularly relevant given our current vice president's support of the
apartheid regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackNewtown Donating Member (703 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. How about the Irgun, Stern gang, etc. terror that "liberated" Israel?
Edited on Tue Aug-01-06 11:56 PM by JackNewtown
We don't need to cite the ANC to debate Palestinian terror. Israel itself used terror when it was occupied, and then rewarded several former terrorists, including two former leaders of terror groups, Shamir and Begin, with Israel's prime ministership. An anti-terror pro-terror former Israeli prime minister and leader of the opposition Likud Party celebrated that terror just a week or two...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. ANC violence
Edited on Wed Aug-02-06 12:00 AM by tabatha
For the most part the violence was by the police on the Blacks.
Protests that were supposed to be peaceful, turned violent because of the actions of the police.
The armed wing of the ANC was formed to combat the militancy and brutality of the government.
Violence by the ANC was very small and over many years compared to what has gone on in Iraq the last 3-4 years.
One of the most important factors however was the economy.
As a result of sanctions, the Rand devalued enormously until it became clear that Apartheid was a failed policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC