Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge dismisses phone records lawsuit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:23 PM
Original message
Judge dismisses phone records lawsuit
Judge dismisses phone records lawsuit
By MIKE ROBINSON, Associated Press Writer

CHICAGO - Citing national security, a federal judge Tuesday threw out a lawsuit aimed at blocking AT&T from giving telephone records to the government for use in the war on terror.

"The court is persuaded that requiring AT&T to confirm or deny whether it has disclosed large quantities of telephone records to the federal government could give adversaries of this country valuable insight into the government's intelligence activities," U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Kennelly said.

Kennelly ruled in a lawsuit filed by the
American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois on behalf of author Studs Terkel and other activists who said their constitutional rights were violated because of a National Security Agency program of gathering phone company records.

Justice Department attorneys had argued it that would violate the law against divulging state secrets for AT&T to say whether it had provided telephone records to the supersecret spy agency.

more at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060725/ap_on_re_us/phone_records_lawsuit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well that makes it a tie
One coward in Illinois and one hero in California. I had a feeling that the judge in Chicago was going to fold!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who nominated Judge Kennelly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Bill Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Off to the SCOTUS!
Let Dick Cheney's good, good hunting buddy Scalia decide. I just can't imagine the outcome. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. what a bullshit ruling
"...could give adversaries of this country valuable insight into the government's intelligence activities"

"...would violate the law against divulging state secrets for AT&T to say whether it had provided telephone records to the supersecret spy agency."

Nothing can be known because all knowledge is a matter of national security.

America has lost it's ever loving mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can this be reinstated up on appeal?
Are they pursuing this? Anybody know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. so if AT&T tells the truth to their customers, then the terrorists win?
Is that the logic?

Just think...terrorists didn't consider the possibility of phone taps before this story broke! Nope. I'm sure they had NOOO idea that THIS could be EVER be a possibility. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh, bullshit
Any terrorist out there now assumes his phones are under surveillance. They've known that from the git-go, which is why they use disposable cell phones, public telephones, phone cards, and public internet posts. If you don't want the government to know who you are, it's not that hard. Get a stolen laptop and buy an account at Starbucks under a false name. Then never use the same Starbucks twice. Just for one example.

This is just pure fascism. The gov. can do whatever it wants, and then screeches national security when it gets caught. Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAYJDF Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is BuschShit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. We all anticipated this. The government is going to scream "National
Security issue" at every turn. It's all they have, and there will be some judges stupid enough or complicit enough to allow them to get away from it. We all know - any intelligent person knows - that phone records are being monitored. The fact that this activity is acknowledged means nothing. Everybody already knows.

Our Constitution and our rights and liberties are being shredded in new ways every day, and we need people with power to start saying NO to put a stop to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC