Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Matalin still spinning, issuing falsehoods on Plame case! 'VIDEO'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 02:48 PM
Original message
Matalin still spinning, issuing falsehoods on Plame case! 'VIDEO'
:hi: "Matalin still spinning,:crazy: issuing falsehoods on Plame case

Summary: On Fox News' Hannity & Colmes,:crazy: Republican strategist Mary Matalin falsely claimed that special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald said "that no crime was committed" in the alleged leak of former CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity and that former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV was "flat-out lying" in his 2003 New York Times op-ed." http://mediamatters.org/items/200607120003 :crazy: "Media Matters for America has noted numerous times (for example, here and here), when Fitzgerald announced the indictment of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby on charges of perjury and obstructing the grand jury's efforts to investigate the alleged leak of Plame's identity, he explained that he had been unable to determine whether the alleged leak itself constituted a violation of the law, not that a crime had not been committed, as Matalin asserted. Also, while the CIA report on Wilson's findings is still classified, the Senate Intelligence Committee disclosed much of its contents in its 2004 "Report on the U.S. Intelligence Community's Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq." The descriptions contained in the committee's report indicate that the findings and version of events Wilson disclosed to the CIA did not contradict those detailed in his op-ed".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Horrible, horrible woman.
My wife went to a communicators conference last year. Matalin and Snakehead were the keynote speakers. Matalin received polite applause. Snakehead brought down the house.

People hate lying thugs. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't stand that mealy-mouthed woman.
She's on the level of our dear Coulter. She needs to have her brain throttled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Republican women are UGLY UGLY UGLY
Take these three:

1. Ann Coulter
2. Katherine Harris
3. Mary Matalin

All vicious, nauseating, bitches. Apparently their sole purpose for living is to make the lives of others uncomfortable. They all lie and manipulate, and none of them have a basic sense of right and wrong.

All of them will go to hell for their deeds. Hopefully sooner rather than later. It's what's best for humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoBear Donating Member (781 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well, beauty is only skin deep, BUT
ugly goes clear to the bone...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. She is a quintessential harpy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Fitzgerald said that no crime has been committed" is just wrong.
"Fitz didn't say that a crime had been committed" is right. That's one of the two options his job provides for.

The other, "A crime has been a committed", is an allegation. A charge.

"Fitzgerald said that no crime has been committed" is the equivalent of "the jury found John innocent." The best a jury does is find a person 'not guilty.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC