Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CONGRESS OKS HARVESTING OF WILD HORSES

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:39 AM
Original message
CONGRESS OKS HARVESTING OF WILD HORSES
Edited on Fri Jun-30-06 08:44 AM by leftyladyfrommo
THOSE ASSHOLES.

NO PUBLIC HEARINGS.

EFFECTIVE JAN 5

http://www.banderabulletin.com/articles/2006/06/27/news/lifestyles/life70.txt

Does anyone know how we can fight this.

WHY DON'T WE JUST PAVE THIS COUNTRY OVER IN ASPHALT - THAT SEEMS TO BE WHAT THEY WANT TO DO TO IT.

THIS REALLY PISSES ME OFF.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. arn't the horses themselves an introduced species?
I'm seen flocks? Heards? of wild horses inround northern arizona,
and lots of them die from starvation and stuff. Do you let your
stray dogs in the street to starve, or do you kill them in death camps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Yes, horses are an introduced species --
introduced by the Spanish in the 16th century. They are not runaway stable nags. Yes, there are problems with starvation, particularly since we allow big biz and corporate ranching to utilize and destroy the most productive areas of public land.

There are herds of wild horses in eleven western states and 3 eastern states; the largest herd (over 18,000) is in Nevada. Currently, there are 178 wild horse and 58 wild burro herds -- an estimated 34,500 horses. This according to the BLM, the agency legally charged with their protection.

They're not "strays," they are a natural resource (not to mention living creatures), and they have a right to exist -- not to be rounded up and slaughtered for sale. This isn't about humane culling of a herd that has grown to large to survive on limited resources, it's about greed and another Congressional moment of ignoring and undermining existing law to benefit someone's economic bottom line. The Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Protection Act is existing law -- or was, until this Congress got their greedy paws on it. See here: http://www.wildhorseandburro.blm.gov/theact.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. The ownership society can't tolerate living creatures
Living creatures have externalities, and ownership denies externalities exist, that
life is an irony of kapital flesh.

If all the land is owned, then the grazing stocks are owned, and it is a total
corruption of the constitution, but wasn't sport hunting the death of the great buffalo
heards, and the coming of the white man, isn't that the new neo-narrative that we've been
drummed with, that "our" cultural identity is to kill living creatures for kicks, to
cull them for profit senselessly that our hearts are so hardened, we would terrorize
a million people or a billion people with nuclear weapons without batting an eyelash.

This sounds injust, but i would hope horse lovers rise up and let their aristocratic
voices heard by the american oligarchy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh that's just great...
:grr:
Hope there is something we can do about it - count me in!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. We beat these guys back and beat these guys back
and they just keep sneaking one liners into bills - nobody even knows they are there - and then get their bills passed that way.

Since when is that how a democracy is supposed to work?

There are lots of powerful groups that are really going to up in arms over this. I have a feeling the fight has just begun.

Slaughtering horses to ship their meat off to Europe and Japan is not going to go over well in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. "Since when is that how a democracy is supposed to work?"
When it gets too big. When one representative "represents" 600,000-700,000 people and 3 million people on average. It's easier to listen to a couple lobbyists that have the real money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timber84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Anyway to access how they voted so I can email mail this to
freeper friends who will be pissed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think that is okay - Wild Horses have little natural means to thin pops
Most wild horses in the US are from released domestic ones... There is nothing to eat them, so they die VERY CRULE DEATHS because there is a little food, and a lot of horses.

I am a huge animal lover, I have 5 in my house right now, but I also understand the need to control wild ones as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Have you ever looked into how horses are slaughtered?
It is just plain God awful.

If there are too many they should have experts shoot them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't disagree there at all !!!
I think you are right, What I was commenting on was the blind hate of the action killing them. I also submit that the way they are killed is nothing as god awful as them starving to death over the course of days or weeks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Not to question your love of animals
Edited on Fri Jun-30-06 09:42 AM by blackops
but I have a little trouble with your reasoning. What is your goal? To make the remaining horses stronger, or to just kill them before they starve? It reminds me of chimpy's logic that chopping down trees makes forests better.

Conservation is important, but Conrad Burns (Abramoff's buddy) is no conservationist. Opening the horses, wild or otherwise, to slaughter will wipe out all of them for profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is one of the latest "actions" I've received from HSUS on this.
I've been taking part in these for more than three years and thought than a permanent ban on horse slaughter in this country was very close to becoming law. Contact your reps through this site, included an e-mail "action" and urges you to also contact them by phone, tells you how...:grr:

https://community.hsus.org/campaign/FED_2006_horses_cosponsorhouse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. Do you mind if I post a seperate thread with this action address?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Not at all! Yikes! Please do! We need all the help we can get!
And if you need for me to do it, I will.:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Almost feels like those Wild Horses are what's left of the old American
spirit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Just Remember Horses are not native to the New World.
http://www.bbhc.org/unbrokenSpirit/menu4_02.cfm

The Horse in the New World: Return of the Native?

When the second voyage of Columbus arrived at Hispaniola on November 22, 1493, both the Old and New Worlds would be forever altered. On 17 ships were 1,200 immigrants and numerous domesticated animals such as cows, pigs, sheep and horses - all brought along to establish ranch colonies in Santo Domingo and the other islands of the West Indies.

Hernán Cortés was the first person to land horses on the North American continent. As part of an effort by the Spanish to establish a colony on the mainland of New Spain (Mexico), Cortés landed at Tabasco on March 13, 1519. Arriving with him on their 11 ships were 508 soldiers and, most importantly, 16 horses. Due in part to his ability to build alliances with Native people, the military advantage of the horse, and the fact that Montezuma thought him the incarnate of the Aztec god, Quetzalcoatl, Cortés and his soldiers managed to overthrow the powerful Aztec empire.

Many other Spanish expeditions ventured into the inland territory of New Spain. In 1521, Juan Ponce de León (on his second trip) sailed for Florida with two ships, 200 men and fifty horses landing near Charlotte Harbor. De Soto's explorers had 237 horses on their 1539 trek from Florida to Missouri. In 1540, Francisco Vázquez de Coronado's explorers conduct extensive inland reconnaissance from what is now Mexico and Arizona to Kansas in search of the Seven Golden Cities of Cíbola. They travelled with 248 stallions, the preference of the Spanish military, and two mares.

Although the basis of legends, escaped horses from the early Spanish expeditions were not the seed stock of the wild horse herds of the American West. Only after the mission system in New Spain was established did horses begin to populate North America. Native groups, like the Apache, did raid the missions for horses, and undoubtedly a few horses would have escaped. However, only after the Pueblo Revolt of 1680 could large numbers of wild horses be seen roaming the grasslands of the Plains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Probably better to say reintroduced rather than not native.
There is ample evidence of prehistoric horse remains in North America -- the grand-daddy of the modern horse was indeed "native" to the continent, it just died out (or more likely, became a convenient food source for other critters, human and otherwise). Yeah, I'm splitting hairs, but so are you . . .

And does it matter how they got here, in the end? Does being non-native make them more eligible for slaughter? I understand the point you're trying to make, but this isn't about humane culling of a too-large herd -- it's about wholesale slaughter for economic profit. Wild horses and burro herds are an irritant to agri-biz, corporate ranching, and others who would like to profit from the sale and use of public lands, much the same attitude of cattle ranchers to sheep ranchers (if you recall the 19th century range wars).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Here I have to side with the immigrants.
You don't have to defend this on the native vs. non-native basis, because the point is, those horses came in with us, with what we know of as today as America. Now the argument is that they're overpopulated and we have to dwindle the herd. Well, to some extent, the same thing is being done to us.

If you really want to take a leap, I think Cheney wanted a perpetual war so he could inforce a draft and dwindle the herd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. I hope they all die from mad horse disease. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's no harvest. It's slaughter for profits to the white good ole boys.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timber84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. Anyone remember this horse:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niccolos_smile Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. This smells on a couple of levels...

I understand the need for conservation and thinning (4 years of a 4-H Wildlife Habitat program will teach you that, as well as few college classes, before I decided to major in politics), but this just isn't right. It's not conservation.

But what I really don't like is this: Republican Senator Conrad Burns of Montana introduced the one-page Rider #142 into the 3,000-page Federal Appropriations Bill HR 4848

I hate that legislators can slip in these riders without going through a hearing. As much as I dislike our convaluted Texas Constitution, the one thing I like about it is that bills must be limited to one subject, so crap like this shouldn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
21. Harvesting?
HARVESTING?

Maybe that's what we're doing in Iraq--harvesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Isn't that an awful word? Harvesting?
Sometimes spin just gets totally out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
24. I am uneducated on this subject.
Edited on Sat Jul-01-06 10:33 AM by blogslut
However, I've noticed a few LTEE's in my local paper condemning the sale of horses for slaughter, from members and supporters of the American Quarterhorse Association. They claim that Quarter Horses are getting sold because of black market dealers n stuff...educate me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC