Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hannity on cook of 9 years: "She's been legal *many* years..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
darkstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 04:51 PM
Original message
Hannity on cook of 9 years: "She's been legal *many* years..."
Hannity had live show from Long Island.

Ran my errand.

Get back and car and man in audience is in midst of claiming to have worked in Hannity's house and sez "When I worked there, you had an illeagal working in your home as cook."

Hannity starts berating the guy about how cook has been with him and family for 9 years, is here legally, she's like a part of his family, and she speaks English really well.

But then Hannity says: "She has been legal for many years."

Not: "Legal the entire time she has been employed by my family." But: "...legal for many years."


Interesting qualification, huh? If it were me and I wanted to speak definitively on the the subject, I would have made clear that she had been employed legally every day of those 9 years she'd been working at my house. Plus, notice we have no idea when the guy in the aduience did said work (at least I didn't hear it.)


I know this is not that big a deal in the larger scheme of things, but it would be sweet indeed, wouldn't it, if Sean boy just knowingly employed what he would call "Clinton-speak" on this issue b/c he knows--or has good reason to fear--that he just got busted?


Not a prediction of anything here and certainly no proof of nuttin'. But some intrepid bloggers and such might want to close the case on this, huh? If only to remove any possible stain from Hannity's...er...good name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MikeNearMcChord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. If I had my way, anyone who knowingly employs
undocumented workers to avoid paying taxes, unemployment,and worker's compensation.
Would be punished by asset forfeiture. I wonder if anyone came to Sean's defense on his show? I bet he lost a good number of listeners today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msatty99 Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tony Snow on Rush Limbaugh's show
tried to justify what Rushy boy was berating the Bush Admin for a weak policy.
Snow said that under the 'new policy' people can report employers of
illegal immigrants and the employers are subject to criminal prosecution.
He wanted good Americans to 'drop a dime' on those who they suspect
of hiring illegals.

We should take Tony at his word and notify INS immediately that based
on this exchange there is info that Hannity has or is employing an illegal.

That's what YOUR PRESIDENT WANTS YOU TO DO !!!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, it's "amnesty" for the cooks, maid, butlers, chauffers of RWiners? n/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just to be clear, Hannity didn't admit anything.
*I* found the language of his denial suspect, however. Posted hoping someoe might eventually prove to be in the position to track down definitive answer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC