Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's Define Marriage as a Union between boys & girls of the SAME RACE.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:31 AM
Original message
Let's Define Marriage as a Union between boys & girls of the SAME RACE.
Edited on Mon Jun-05-06 06:34 AM by Philosoraptor
Cause all this Inter-Racial marriage is destroying white, Christian, moran America.

And let's make it law, and amend the constitution, and make it a crime to marry out of your own race, or species.

(sarc)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JHH Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. that may be next after bush starts another war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. I demand RELIGIOUS purity!
Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh yes, Marriage between Same Religions ONLY.
No outside mud religions, just Pat Robertson style marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's not good enough
Catholics can't marry Protestants, and within the Protestant branch of Christianity, people can only marry within their own denominations. (Hey, it was a scandal in my family when one cousin in the 60s married outside her church! That was the fundy branch of the family, not my immediate one, which was a lot saner about these things.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. What's wrong with you people?
You left out not allowing people of non-procreative capacity--sterile, impotent, post-menopausal--to marry. What would be the point? And why not match up eye-color, level of education, and in Texas, there would naturally be a prohibition against hitching up a man who wears ropers with a woman who wears "pointy-toe" boots (or vice versa).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Throw in a ban on contraception while you're at it.
If two fertile people are gonna be gettin' it on (within the sacred committment of marriage, of course!)then dad-blast it, we's best be getting some BAYBEEZ out of that sinful, evil pleasure they're experiencing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Thank you!!! Now we're talking control freak here! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Achtung, mein herr!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Several southern states did that...USSC ruled against them in 1961.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. Don't give them any ideas...
Next step after what you propose is an amendment
declaring marriage only legal between mixed gendered individuals
of a select race who are capable of and intend to reproduce.

There is no end to prejudice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well, there goes most of Cpt. Kirk's STAR TREK romances...
And I have to unleash one of these on general principles - feel free to join me:

KHAAAAAN!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. Here Here...and wallpaper the Protestant Church with the 'Murkin Flag
Get all them damn Trojans off the shelves at CVS and Walgreens.

Interesting root to that word 'Protestant'. Kinda wish folks would get back to their roots...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadAsHellNewYorker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. It WAS defined like that for years! Remember the anti-misogyny laws?
Edited on Mon Jun-05-06 10:30 AM by MadAsHellNewYorker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
14. But my turtle and me have been sooo happy...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Didn't I see on the news, awhile ago, about a man who married a duck?!
Why isn't he behind bars?!:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obreaslan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. Don't forget to stay within your own economic class as well...
We can't have one of our powerful elite marrying someone from the lower class can we. What will the neighbors say??? :wow:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC