Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gays don't threaten families - divorces do

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:59 AM
Original message
Gays don't threaten families - divorces do
I thought it was a good slogan. We need to get an amendment going to ban divorce. Divorce has far more of an impact on families than gays could think about.

Contact [email protected].
Let them know your thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just remember, a gay person who gets into a hetero marriage...
particularly and especially if they make children - would be bound by law.

Pity our society can't be openly gay as well; it'd keep any number of people from getting into wrong marriages in the first place and spare any number of people needless hurt and pain.

I dated a guy once who had come out and divorced. It had affected his children badly. It affected his ex-wife badly. And it affected him badly too. I saw what had happened and how could I not feel sympathy? Yet OTOH he made his choices and I felt he made a mistake by abandoning his family for personal pleasure. When you make a family, your own needs end there and then. Period. Regardless of reason, be it sexual or ANYTHING. At all. The children get first and foremost priority. Make them second fiddles to your personal problems and they'll be fucked up for life too. (or the chances are greater). And we've seen how children considered inconveniences by their parents have turned out.

What's going on is far more transcendental than the one aspect being whined about (two men or two women marrying). The societal undercurrents is considerable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Suppose he had stayed in his marriage and
everyone, including the children, were screwed up by the unhappiness of the situation. That happens all the time, too.

I also know a guy who left his marriage to live with his male lover. He married in the first place to deny who he was. The divorce was right for everyone. He stayed close to his children.

I don't think divorce is a bad thing. In many cases, it is a very good thing.

I do know what you mean about putting children first. That is only one reason why pregnancies should be planned. I know I thought before I had kids. They were my first priority until they were grown. However, parents have other relationships and needs. It is possible to find a balance between selfishness and responsibility in parenting and other relationships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I know a woman whose husband of twenty years had bipolar disorder.
He left her, and she was devastated . . . at first. Turns out that it was the best thing that could have happened to her, and to their children.

Each family has its own individual circumstances. Just as with abortion, this should be the private decision of those who are directly affected. Not the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Are you thinking of this just as a tactic, or do you really think this?
Some marriages will never work, and all members of the family suffer while the marriage is ongoing. Other parents, who never should have married but decide to stay together, do a good job in maintaining a decent relationship for the sake of the children.


The state shouldn't be sticking it's nose in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm saying the GOP say norm is marriage
and they should back it by saying no to divorce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. But would you be happy if they were successful?
My parents' marriage was a disaster. We were not better off, because my father took his unhappiness out on all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. You have to look at the qualifiers
Their are a lot of gay relationships that are positive. But if marriage between sexes takes on a favored relationship they should take on extra responsibilities.

No marriages for gays, no divorces for straights. Let's really protect the family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Erika, you don't understand.
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 03:35 AM by pnwmom
My father was gay. That was the problem. And staying together, as they did, didn't protect us kids at all. It was a torment for everybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubeskin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. So then what happens in my case?
Where my two gay mothers get a divorce(currently happening right now. They have been together for 29 years)? Oh wait, those are REALLY bad, because god wants EVERYONE to stay together, except killing innocent people is alright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'd suggest you contact W for counselling
He offered the same for Iraqis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Nice attitude.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. USA has the highest divorce rate in the world
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 01:41 AM by jerry611
If you are married today, you have a 60% chance of the marriage failing.

The big problem is that people get married for stupid reasons. They get married for looks, money, or the woman ends up pregnant. You get married for any of those reasons, your marriage won't last long. And women are just as much to blame for this as men.

We have become an extremely superficial society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. So we need an amendment to ban divorce
Divorce rates among straight couples endangers children far more than gay marriages, so we need an amendment to ban divorce for the sake of families and children.

Please contact [email protected] to express this.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. It's a crazy idea with, thankfully, no chance of succeeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Couldn't we just ban Republicans from marriage?
After all, seems to me that they couldn't possibly be good at child rearing. . .and Lord knows there isn't an honest, monogamous bone(r) in their body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. LOL. Yeah, and that plan has about a good a chance of succeeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. That may be true for second marriages, but it's not true for
first marriages. In fact, the rate has actually been going down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. If this isn't just some gag, or some political statement,
there are things that can be done to significantly lower the divorce rate.

#1. Raise the age of marriage to 21. The states with the highest divorce rates tend to be those with the earliest age at first marriage.

#2. Increase education. Higher education correlates with a lower divorce rate.

http://marriage.rutgers.edu/Publications/pubtenthingsyoungadults.htm

"For large segments of the population, the risk of divorce is far below fifty percent.
Although the overall divorce rate in America remains close to fifty percent of all marriages, it has been dropping gradually over the past two decades. Also, the risk of divorce is far below fifty percent for educated people going into their first marriage, and lower still for people who wait to marry at least until their mid-twenties, haven't lived with many different partners prior to marriage, or are strongly religious and marry someone of the same faith. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. actually, I kind of agree with you...
I get what you're saying, Erika.

Why is it that we can make and break solemnly-sworn marriage commitments with abandon when children are involved, but when gays ask for a chance to marry -- quick, we must all rally to defend the sanctity of Marriage!

:eyes:

I agree. It's two-faced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. Yep, what a load of hypocricy
their whole "sanctity of marriage" issue is, isn't it? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
21. this place is nuttier than a walnut tree sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC