Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When did Bush know?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:23 PM
Original message
When did Bush know?
Discrepancy seen as administration says he didn't learn of massacre probe for nearly a month

BY CRAIG GORDON
Newsday Washington Bureau

June 2, 2006

WASHINGTON -- The White House said yesterday it took nearly a month for President George W. Bush to learn the military was investigating whether Marines gunned down civilians in Haditha - an incident Iraq's leader called "a horrible crime" as he launched his own probe.

That explanation appeared at odds with a White House statement earlier this week that Bush was told of the inquiry "soon after" it was launched in February. Bush never discussed Haditha in public until he was asked about it by reporters Wednesday.

Yet what happened there last November now looms as a serious threat to Bush's hopes of reviving public support for the war at home, as well as being a growing impediment to smooth relations with the newly formed Iraqi government.

Meanwhile, in Iraq, U.S. commanders announced that all 132,000 American troops and other coalition forces would receive a special course on proper battlefield conduct - a 30-day program to reinforce "the values that separate us from our enemies," said Lt. Gen. Peter Chiarelli, the No. 2 U.S. general in Iraq.

But Iraq's new prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, stepped up his criticism of U.S. forces yesterday as he announced an investigation into the Haditha killings, along with other incidents involving U.S. troops.

cont'd...

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/ny-wobush024765646jun02,0,848787,print.story?coll=ny-leadworldnews-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. The words "Bush" and "Know"
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 03:31 PM by Bob3
Never sit comfortably in the same sentence. It becomes increasingly difficult to believe that * knows anything but the most basic things - how to tie shoes, how to tell time, how to walk - how to drink. but other than that well depends on the time of day I guess.

on edit - from tenses I know nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Better
When will Bush know and when will he know it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. You can put all sorts of reports
and memos (think back to prior 9/11) in front of that doofus and he still will not "know" it.

Ultra deniability in place. Unless he hears it emphatically in person from a loyalist (Condi etc.) - it is summarily dismissed as inconsequential.

I thought I hated Nixon, I thought I hated Reagan -- but I now truly hate GWB - both the policies and the persona.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. whatever they say is a lie
they can't tell the truth

never have

never will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They being the "media" or this administration?
:-)

It's so hard to tell what is talking point and what is the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. the administration
the media frequently dwells on irrelevant truth to avoid the greater truth, so they don't always lie. Natalie Holloway DID go missing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. when does he know anything?
most likely someone left a newspaper ontop of his coloring book, and he "accidently" read the article while looking for his red crayon.

or his bad news filter on BUBBLE-ONE is malfuntioning....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "or his bad news filter on BUBBLE-ONE is malfuntioning...."
:rofl:

Thanks! Coffee all over my desk now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC