Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm not impressed by anyone's Iraq views in this NYT article on '08 race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:16 PM
Original message
I'm not impressed by anyone's Iraq views in this NYT article on '08 race
After pointing out the problem her war views have been causing Hillary lately and noting that Kerry and Edwards are now on record regretting their votes, Adam Nagourney quotes two Dem executives who will probably run in 2008: Tom Vilsack of Iowa and Mark Warner of Virginia. (The article, about the difficulty members of Congress have because of the voting record, also looks at Repubs McCain and Mitt Romney):

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/02/washington/02senators.html?pagewanted=print

Gov. Tom Vilsack of Iowa, a Democrat, declined to say in an interview how he would have voted on the war.

"I'm not going to get into that; this isn't about what happened in the past," Mr. Vilsack said. "If we're looking at the elections of 2006 and 2008, I think it's important to look to the future and learn from whatever mistakes we made in the past."

Mark Warner, a former Virginia governor and another likely Democratic presidential contender, said he did not support setting a deadline for troop withdrawal.

"We have been put in this extraordinarily difficult situation," Mr. Warner said. "My sense is going out without a plan is just as bad as going in without a plan. So I have not been one of those people who say that come heck or high water, we are going to leave by a fixed date."

...

"I don't think any U.S. senator, regardless of party, if they had known there weren't W.M.D., that we were going to get selected leaks, I don't think anybody would have voted for it," he said. "Second-guessing people who made a valiant attempt at judgment is not where I am at."


...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Vilsack and Warner
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 02:20 PM by sparosnare
Can't stand either one of them - and Warner sounds like Bush with that statement. Vilsack doesn't want to look at what happened in the past...that's just plain stupid. How will we keep it from happening again? Huh Tom?

Ugh.

x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Conservative and conservative, what do you expect?
As long as all they interview are conservatives, we're going to get this deadly dull, wrongheaded viewpoint.

Conservatives are the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC