Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What was the origin of the now ubiquitous term

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 09:50 AM
Original message
What was the origin of the now ubiquitous term
"corporatization"? Is it a Green term? A Nader term? Or what? (When I hit "check spelling" it doesn't show up in the choices, so it's a nonstandard word.)

So, excuse me for being dumb, but what does it mean . . . exactly?

Are all NAFTA or CAFTA politicians automatically corporatists? Was Bill Clinton a corporatist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. the term goes back to a Pope in the late 1800's
Edited on Wed May-24-06 10:04 AM by davepc
by the early 1920's some other Italians had adopted the idea and refined it a bit.

They were called fascists.

" Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini

but corporatism as a political or economic system in one form or another is probably as old as capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. So when DU'ers say a politician is a corporatist, what they really mean is
Edited on Wed May-24-06 10:32 AM by pnwmom
that person is a fascist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. If you go by Mussolini's definition, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. 'fascist' has a lot more baggage then just its economic underpinnings
so to call some one a corpratist isn't necessarily to compare them to Mussolini or Hitler.

Both "classical" Laissez-faire free market capitalism and modern social democratic philosophy adhere to a separation of corporate and state power, with the former (at its ideological purity) believe corporate power is best left to be regulated by the forces of the free market, and the later believing government exists in part to be a check against corporate power excess.

fascists/corporatists believe that governments JOB is to promote and assist corporate power. "whats good for GM is good for America!" etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. NAFTA and CAFTA defenders, who do not agree
that any reforms are needed in order to make the setup more fair to labor and more protective of the local environment... those are corporatists.

And yes, Bill Clinton is a corporatist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Do you agree with the first poster? So does that make Clinton a fascist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Not necessarily.
However, wasn't the whole 'free speech zones' thing started under his watch? Perhaps fascism-enabler is more accurate.

Also, I think you're twisting the other poster's words. They said if you use Mussolini's definition, then yes... not that they agreed that this was the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Fascism strives for a one-party state
under a banner of extreme nationalism, militarism and anti-individualism, according to Robert Paxton's "Anatomy of Fascism." By that token, I would argue that Clinton was more a "right-
centrist" than a "fascist."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Why a right-centrist? Why not just a centrist,
given that some of his positions were more on the left?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The principal reason I place him at the right-center is
welfare reform, which took a bad situation and made it much worse for the poor and working poor. Then there's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" which I see as a center-right solution to the issue of gays in the military. (Contrast it with Truman's executive order desegrating the armed forces. Truman was no radical leftist, either.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Don't forget NAFTA
Biggest backstab of the labor movement by the left up till that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. True, I had forgotten about NAFTA -- we are now
reaping its whirlwind, in the form of massive migration of workers from south of the border. Many of them were forced northward by economic exigencies brought on by NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC