Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PA Nuke Plant/ $500K in duffel bag incident-- some info about the guards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 11:42 AM
Original message
PA Nuke Plant/ $500K in duffel bag incident-- some info about the guards

http://pepei.pennnet.com/News/Display_News_Story.cfm?Section=WireNews&SubSection=HOME&NewsID=133770


<snip>

The guards had no power to detain the men and, after notifying state police of the unusual situation, could only watch as they drove off. Unlike security agents at airports, who are employees of the federal government and empowered to act on federal laws, guards at Shippingport and other nuclear power plants across the country are privately employed by security companies hired by the plants' owners. Pennsylvania law does not grant private security guards the authority to detain someone, but does allow them to be armed and to use their weapons to protect property. Because the two men didn't try to force their way into the plant, according to local police, the guards acted properly in notifying authorities.

Diane Screnci, a spokeswoman for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, said security firms must adhere to strict federal regulations, and a plant's operating license can hinge on proving that it is properly guarded. At the Shippingport plant, owned by Akron, Ohio-based FirstEnergy Corp., guards are employees of Securitas Security Services USA Inc. Security there is so tight, Wes Hill, director of the Beaver County Emergency Services Center, said, "They won't even let me in until I go through a security check."

FirstEnergy spokesman Todd Schneider on Friday declined to discuss the number of security guards at the plant, their training or what type of weaponry they carry, only to say that they are "very heavily armed." Screnci said the type of weapons varies from site to site, depending on state regulations.

<snip>

Peter Stockton, a senior investigator for the Project on Government Oversight, a Washington-based watchdog group, praised the guards' actions. However, he said, ongoing concerns include the type of weapons guards are allowed to carry, saying they might not be enough in the event of a full-blown terrorist attack making use of rocket-propelled grenades and similar force. Many security guards, Stockton said, don't have military experience and, while not questioning their bravery, questioned how they would react during an attack. "The vast majority of these men have never been under live fire," Stockton said. Training exercises that guards periodically undergo don't properly imitate the violent conditions that would occur in a real attack, he said.

<snip>

A Securitas representative at the Shippingport plant did not return a phone call seeking additional information.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's bullshit.
You take off your badge, declare yourself off-duty, and make a citizen's arrest.

That's what the damned shopping mall security guards used to be told to do!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. And the people that sent them to do their job
knew that.
It was a no risk situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC