Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ: Selling Generic Drugs by Mail Turns Into Lucrative Business

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 10:53 AM
Original message
WSJ: Selling Generic Drugs by Mail Turns Into Lucrative Business
The Wall Street Journal

Strategic Position

Selling Generic Drugs by Mail Turns Into Lucrative Business

Benefit Managers Say They Save Employers Money, As Their Own Profits Rise
Off-Patent Bonanza Ahead
By BARBARA MARTINEZ
May 9, 2006; Page A1

In many industries, middlemen scrape by on small margins. Not so in generic drugs.

Documents from 2001 filed in an Ohio court case show that Medco Health Solutions Inc. paid $90 that year for the pills to fill 114 prescriptions for a generic copy of Valium. Medco sent its client, the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, a bill of $1,028 for the drugs, which also reflected its dispensing costs. Medco paid $766 for the pills to fill hundreds of prescriptions for the blood-pressure medicine atenolol. It billed the Ohio teachers $25,628. Today, Caremark Rx Inc., another middleman, charges the federal government and employees $96.88 for 90 pills of generic Prozac, according to a Caremark Web site. The same pills can be bought wholesale for less than $5.

(snip)

It's a hugely lucrative place in the food chain. Generic drugs are popular because they save money by offering alternatives to expensive brand-name drugs. But the PBMs have figured out how to use mail order to turn generics into a bonanza. Buying in bulk, the PBMs typically pay a few cents per pill, then turn around and bill employers a quarter, 50 cents or even a dollar a pill. A Medco spokeswoman, Ann Smith, says final profit is much smaller than that spread because of administrative and dispensing costs. For the employers, the generic prices look like a bargain because they're generally still much lower than those of brand-name drugs. The employers often don't know the spreads enjoyed by the PBMs.

(snip)

The business has brought gains for PBM shareholders and made some PBM executives rich, chiefly from valuable stock options, even as many employers and employees struggle to afford health insurance. Caremark's chief executive, Edwin M. "Mac" Crawford, has sold $185 million in stock since November. At Express Scripts, Chairman Barrett Toan has sold $64.8 million in stock since last fall. It helps the PBMs that many employers are unfamiliar with the economics of manufacturing pills. While a brand-name pill such as Lipitor or Prozac may cost employers $2 or more, most of that goes into marketing, research into future drugs and profit for the drug company. The cost of actually producing the pills is usually only a few cents each.

(snip)

Recently, some states have been pushing back against PBMs, weighing laws to force the middlemen to reveal where their profits come from. The laws would also make PBMs fiduciaries of their clients, just like accountants or lawyers. That would limit the PBMs' ability to grab lucrative margins through pricing methods that employers find hard to follow. Meanwhile, a handful of employers are looking for ways to buy generics for a price closer to what they cost to make. But for now, the generic mail-order business is booming. It represents the latest evolution of an industry that has played a key behind-the-scenes role in the $250 billion U.S. pharmaceuticals business.

(snip)

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114713546203047327.html (subscriptin)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. self-kick this is what we need to run with
in the elections. On how many of us are squeezed from health care while the CEOs of companies that do not treat patients, do not invent new treatment, are only shuffling papers - reap millions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC